Live data from Hacker News

DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

github.com

301–310 of 322 posts

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#301
post #294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kudos! Cool idea, I'm on the same path you are, yet you're just one step ahead. For mouse.dev, what are you using for the cloud agent sandbox piece? I haven't moved my agents to the cloud yet (for on the go mobile enablement). Would Islo be a competitor to mouse? https://islo.dev/ https://www.incredibuild.com/blog/why-we-built-islo-ai-codin...

cool! I've been mostly building for what coding from an iphone can look like. the cloud agent sandbox portion is definitely not polished yet but working well so far. i looked at daytona, e2b, modal ect. but decided to roll my own with fly.io. ttl on agent create. mouse uses per-thread sandboxes (not shared-container multi-workspace) and then post-gres for agent history ect. i'll have to look more at islo, I definitel…

Great ideas, I'll look at those too. We're only a few steps away from building our own cloud providers :D.

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#302
post #271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How does the kimi subscription compare to Codex and Claude Code in terms of how much mileage you get for the pricing? I mean, I see the prices but not sure how usage that buys.

Kimi feels almost limitless. I have the $40/month plan and I've never ever remotely close to hitting the limit. Using opus as the orchestrator.

I've had some good results with Kimi in Opencode. Can you tell me more about using Opus as orchestrator - what type of harness setup?

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#303
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Their process is outlined here: https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.m... > Maintainers review auto-closed issues daily and reopen worthwhile ones. Issues that do not meet the quality bar below will not be reopened or receive a reply. Seems like not an unreasonable way to deal with the problem of large numbers of low quality issues being submitted.

Sounds like a perfect way to agitate the community going against the established culture like that.

::shrug::

I quite like pi and learned about the contribution guidelines a while after using it. Hard to complain about people making software for free using a process that works for them.

I will say having a project with a slim issue tracker that only contains things the maintainers have blessed (and thus presumably are more likely to get worked on) is pretty nice.

If you’re googling for a bug your hitting and come across and auto closed issue, you know you have to submit a higher quality issue to get it looked at, rather than just +1ing the existing lacking issue.

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#304
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's surprisingly good. Beats MiniMax 2.7 and Qwen 3.5 Plus in my testing (I haven't tested 3.6 plus though), quite handily. It's far better than Sonnet, and often equivalent to Opus for the web development and OCaml tasks I'm using it for. It definitely isn't Opus 4.7, but its far good enough to earn it's keep and is substantially cheaper.

Did you compare it with Kimi K2.6 and DeepSeek V4 Pro? I feel they're similar but as GLM is more expensive, I am not using it much.

[dead]

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#305
post #21

#!/bin/sh export ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://api.deepseek.com/anthropic export ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN=sk-secret export ANTHROPIC_MODEL=deepseek-v4-flash export CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_NONESSENTIAL_TRAFFIC=1 exec claude $@

Damn, we need something like this for Ollama.

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#306
post #21

#!/bin/sh export ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://api.deepseek.com/anthropic export ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN=sk-secret export ANTHROPIC_MODEL=deepseek-v4-flash export CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_NONESSENTIAL_TRAFFIC=1 exec claude $@

Damn, we need something like this for Ollama.

Ollama works with Claude Code:

$ ollama launch claude --model qwen3.5 [1]

[1] https://docs.ollama.com/integrations/claude-code

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#307
post #50
post #13

I'm not exactly sure what the point of this is. Deepseek already has instructions to use its API with many CLI's including Claude Code directly: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/agent_integrations...

From vibe coders for vibe coders

Its vibes all the way down

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#308
post #21

#!/bin/sh export ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://api.deepseek.com/anthropic export ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN=sk-secret export ANTHROPIC_MODEL=deepseek-v4-flash export CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_NONESSENTIAL_TRAFFIC=1 exec claude $@

how do subagents work?

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#309
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the problem: you need the best model, not just a good one, for: - Good architecture, which requires reading specs, code, etc. reads like: lots of tokens in/out - Bug fixing — same, plus logs, e.g. datadog Once you've found the path, patches are trivial and the savings are tiny unless you're doing refactoring/cleanup. testing gets more and more complicated. Take a look at opencode go, and you see this: >Includ…

I'd argue that you need the model that's good enough, not the best.

any missed bug, any wrong architecture decision, is a huge loss, sure , if you run it as autocomplete on steroids you can get any Chinese model. If you try to move faster, and that is a conscious choice, any hiccup is a productivity loss and tons of tokens burned.

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#310
post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did read the code. OpenCode uses your global `small_model` ( https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/dev/packages/open... ) or title agent ( https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/51e310c9/packages... ) OpenCode Zen is their own service provider; they see your prompt the same way OpenAI and Anthropic do. Somebody has to see your code, unless you host your models yourself.

So, by default, they read our prompts. What else is hiding ?

[deleted]
Post reply on HN