Earlier quoted context omitted.
Worthless. Just looks how IFS worked out the previous two times they gave it a go. If you're not in the industry you may not even be aware it was a thing. And then not. Twice.
And how many times did Intel get sued for breach of contract over changing their mind? If they have a contract, they'll honor it or compensate.
Intel's make-or-break 18A process node debuts for data center with 288-core Xeon
301–303 of 303 posts
Re: Intel's make-or-break 18A process node debuts for data center with 288-core Xeon
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
I bought a bundle with 512GB of RAM and an older 24-core EPYC (7F72) + supermicro motherboard on ebay a bit over a year ago, it was really an amazing deal and has made for a truly nice NAS. If you're okay with stuff that's old enough that you can buy decommissioned server stuff, you can get really high-quality gear at surprisingly low prices. Companies decommission hardware on a schedule after all, not when it stops…
I'm curious, what is the powe draw for such a system? Of course, it heavily depends on the disks, but does it idle under 200W? I personally feel like I will downscale my homelab hardware to reduce its power draw. My HW is rather old (and leagues below yours), more recent HW tends to be more efficient, but I have no idea how well these high end server boards can lower their idle power consumption?