301–310 of 336 posts
There's https://happy.engineering/ which already does this with many fewer bugs and supports codex.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Struggled with it also, given up (for now). I thought coding was a solved problem Boris?
I have little doubt where things are going, but the irony of the way they communicate versus the quality of their actual product is palpable. Claude Code (the product, not the underlying model) has been one of the buggiest, least polished products I have ever used. And it's not exactly rocket science to begin with. Maybe they should try writing slightly less than 100% of their code with AI?
Weird all these companies struggle so much to support remote services, ssh has been working for me pretty seamlessly for like the 20 years I've been using it and has allowed me to remote-control any computer I own with relatively reliable authentication (with some hiccups that tend to be patched pretty rapidly when found) throughout that entire period. I hear tell it worked even before I was using computers professio…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have little doubt where things are going, but the irony of the way they communicate versus the quality of their actual product is palpable. Claude Code (the product, not the underlying model) has been one of the buggiest, least polished products I have ever used. And it's not exactly rocket science to begin with. Maybe they should try writing slightly less than 100% of their code with AI?
What bugs have you encountered? It's been a smooth experience for me.
Also if a prisma migration fails it will say “this is dev it’s ok to erase the database” before rerunning the command with —accept-data-loss
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What bugs have you encountered? It's been a smooth experience for me.
Not a big exactly but if pip doesn’t work it goes straight to pip —break-system instead of realizing it needs a venv Also if a prisma migration fails it will say “this is dev it’s ok to erase the database” before rerunning the command with —accept-data-loss
This scares me.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have little doubt where things are going, but the irony of the way they communicate versus the quality of their actual product is palpable. Claude Code (the product, not the underlying model) has been one of the buggiest, least polished products I have ever used. And it's not exactly rocket science to begin with. Maybe they should try writing slightly less than 100% of their code with AI?
I am constantly amazed how developers went hard for claude-code when there were and are so many better implementations of the same idea. It's also a tool that has a ton of telemetry, doesn't take advantage of the OS sandbox, and has so many tiny little patch updates that my company has become overworked trying to manage this. Its worst feature (to me at least), is the, "CLAUDE.md"s sprinkled all over, everywhere in o…
Like, isn't the whole point of those files to not have to constantly reference them??
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Struggled with it also, given up (for now). I thought coding was a solved problem Boris?
It is solved in his org. He never promised quality software, though. You get a buggy electron app and they get billions in valuation. Clearly no one values quality anymore. 1000% yolo
/s
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly my experience, I know they vibe code features and that’s fine but it looks like they don’t do proper testing which is surprising to me because all you need bunch of cheap interns to some decent enough testing
Thats not true. Even for testing things, you need to do thoroughly now because standards are high.
This is the bar we're at now.
One more step closer to a closed source system. I think their objective is to move all your code on their systems so you can only modify the code through their AI so they have a moat and will be difficult to move away. They will “guard” your source code and you’ll never see it. Imagine if tomorrow they make a 10x smarter AI, but they say: you can only use if you upload your source code to us and you can’t see anymore…
Seems like it could be problematic in the future since code can't be fixed by humans so the only source of future code for training is unedited Claudeslop.
He will say: the cost of this big is costing you 100k a year. We will fix for 10k one time fee.
One more step closer to a closed source system. I think their objective is to move all your code on their systems so you can only modify the code through their AI so they have a moat and will be difficult to move away. They will “guard” your source code and you’ll never see it. Imagine if tomorrow they make a 10x smarter AI, but they say: you can only use if you upload your source code to us and you can’t see anymore…
Yeah, the only thing keeping them from doing that is that the open weight free models are just as good. I wonder if they would take away your ability to prompt, maybe only letting you run agentically.