Earlier quoted context omitted.
The IRS mileage cost of 0.70/mi is for a car in a situation that an Uber driver should never be in, that is, an average car with average fuel economy being professionally serviced and maintained, with average depreciation and interest rate. None of those should be the case for anyone driving Uber.
But that was the lure of ridesharing. Bring your own average car, no need to buy special equipment. If you do have to buy a car just for uber, then you would have to consider the interest payments as additional cost (not just the depreciation of the equipment, which will be super brutal for a brand new car). In any case, you are looking at something north of 50 cents per mile. AAA has a nice breakdown: https://www.ac…
I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
301–310 of 316 posts
Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#302Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#303Greed. There are many ways to do good business, but we constantly push for exploitation. Technology will be blamed as always, not the operators. Humans such a disappointment.
>Humans such a disappointment. Compared to what, and idealized versions of ourselves? Or animals who rip the throats out of other mammals to eat?
Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
It may be that they have no choice since it's their biggest source of customers. I spoke to a hotel receptionist before and she said the order of upgrades was: booked direct, booking.com, Expedia and all the rest after. The hotel couldn't afford to piss off booking as they would suffer a lot in occupancy, the other platforms couldn't match. I think it's worth giving the feedback to the restaurant direct and see if th…
Once I've walked into the hotel and asked for a room. They said price 20% higher than listed on booking.com. When asked about this the receptionist said I can book there.
Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not backing up the claims, but, You don't need to know the account or account number, just need to know the transaction logic, which most backend developer will know of as long as they work in that area. If the product managers keep boasting about their new strategy (which I have seen in almost all companies I have worked for), even the juniors will know what's going on.
Except this is complete bullshit. Money is anonymous. Why would they have some kind of pipeline account that goes directly from the fees to political spend? Why wouldn't the fees just go to a generic revenue account and the lobbying would come out of the same account? This is like claiming someone set up a special account where all their paychecks on rainy days get spent directly on weed. It makes zero sense.
> Money is anonymous.
Unless you pay in cash (or some cryptocurrency that doesn't leave traces), money is not anonymous. Not sure what made you make that claim.
> Why would they have some kind of pipeline account that goes directly from the fees to political spend?
Is the pipeline account you mention here the delivery company's account?
> This is like claiming someone set up a special account where all their paychecks on rainy days get spent directly on weed. It makes zero sense.
Pretty sure that already happens, that's one of many ways to do tax evasion with offshore accounts.
Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#306Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess a cash tip is the way to go.
No disrespect to you, but this solution is unacceptable. The onus should not be on customers to workaround corporate wrongdoing. DoorDash states that 100% of the tip goes to drivers. They conveniently omit that some of their base wages will be covered by the tip. That should be illegal, and paying drivers under the table gives DoorDash the right to keep acting badly, my convenience be damned. But let's say I was will…
Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#308I wonder how many people at this company put in their quiting notice yesterday. His wish might be granted. > I’m posting this from a library Wi-Fi on a burner laptop because I am technically under a massive NDA. I don’t care anymore. I put in my two weeks yesterday and honestly, I hope they sue me.
Yeah that was either a tactical misstep, or a smart move if they fabricated the date or the fact that they put in in their two weeks.
They may also not work for the company and just larp as a combo of stories they heard, or it is all made up for karma or kicks.
Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am 95% convinced he was caught because we live in a surveillance panopticon. The McDonald's kiosks could very easily be sharing data with other private companies (e.g. Palantir) who the government contracts with. There are so many other companies jumping in on sharing data like this, why would a company like McDonald's care about selling out customer privacy in exchange for a better bottom line for investors?
He got caught because someone recognized his uniquely bushy eyebrows from the wanted photos. This is all documented, no need for advanced theorizing.
Something being documented doesn't make it true:
Re: I'm a developer for a major food delivery app
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am 95% convinced he was caught because we live in a surveillance panopticon. The McDonald's kiosks could very easily be sharing data with other private companies (e.g. Palantir) who the government contracts with. There are so many other companies jumping in on sharing data like this, why would a company like McDonald's care about selling out customer privacy in exchange for a better bottom line for investors?
>I am 95% convinced he was caught because we live in a surveillance panopticon. I'm sure this is unpopular opinion but I'm glad we can catch murderers quickly which technology. The flip side is worse. Note: This has nothing to do with the reasons for murdering which I'm not going to debate.
According to whom? Homicide clearance rates in the US have been getting worse for decades [1][2]. The same is true in the UK, another surveillance state, where only 10% of violent offenses get solved [3].
This promise of a crime-free utopia has been nothing but a deceptive manipulation of the public and the scary part is that it keeps working.
[1] https://www.murderdata.org/p/reported-homicide-clearance-rat...
[2] https://www.npr.org/2023/04/29/1172775448/people-murder-unso...
[3] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jan/13/most-violent...