Live data from Hacker News

Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws

csoonline.com

301–310 of 404 posts

Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws

#301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dev tools, sure. Self-selecting yourself out of the office/email toolset used by 90% of companies seems like a weird flex.

Teams is just so much more horrible than Slack and Zoom, and dev teams use Slack and/or Zoom.

Slack is an unintuitive piece of junk, and yes I will die on this hill.

Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws

#302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Teams is just so much more horrible than Slack and Zoom, and dev teams use Slack and/or Zoom.

Slack is an unintuitive piece of junk, and yes I will die on this hill.

It is, but all the other ones I've had the misfortune of dealing with have been worse.

Including IRC.

Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws

#304
post #5

There needs to be a law that all nuclear and nuclear-adjacent facilities have no connection to the Internet. The fact it's allowed is unbelievable.

The nuclear systems are air-gapped. So this is already the case.

Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> When expressed in constant 2019 dollars, the average price of electricity in the United States fell from $4.79 per kilowatt-hour in 1902 (the first year for which the national mean is available) to 32 cents in 1950. https://spectrum.ieee.org/electricity-its-wonderfully-afford... $0.32 is $0.41 accoreit BLS, which is less than I'm paying today (I live somewhere with expensive electricity), so I'd enjoy the discount…

> $0.32 is $0.41 accoreit BLS, which is less than I'm paying today Out of curiosity, what was the real power price where you live in the 60s?

Had a long back-and-forth with ChatGPT and it says, accounting for inflation, that it's roughly the same from the 50s and the 60s versus today.

Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws

#306
post #89

As usual with all these types of posts, people go "HA HA, MICRO$OFT SUCKS" without understanding business practices that keep them afloat. Don't use Exchange? Cool, what should we use instead? Does it support 15 people all the way up to 150000 people? I used to run Exchange cluster for 70k people, is there other mail software out there complete with non-shared disk redundancy? Where the users connect to single endpoi…

How oh how did these nuclear weapons facilities manage to function in the days before Exchange and Sharepoint?

They paid lots of secretaries lots of money and had a whole department called "the mailroom".

No one wants to go back to that.

Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws

#308
post #94

One of the first things I do after getting an inquiry from a recruiter or friend referral is lookup the MX record for the company’s email domain. It is an anonymous one-command check to see if they’re a Microsoft shop. If they are, it’s enormous personal red flag. MSFT is very popular so I’m only speaking about my own experience, but I have learned over the course of 20 years that an MSFT IT stack is highly correlate…

Hard agree. I've worked both kinds of places, I'm never working in an MS environment again for less than 7 figures.

And companies that use MS aren't paying 7 figures for anything below VP

Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws

#309
post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm gonna be honest, you sound like a problem employee. The companies not using Microsoft, are using Google. Which in my experience is equally or measurably worse. Just personal data points, but every avowed Microsoft hater I've ever worked with has been... difficult. Like a-drag-on-the-team-because-he-refuses-to-use-company-tools difficult. Edit: How does an aged post on this site go from +4 to -1 in the span of a f…

The chairman of my last big company said I was “ungovernable” at one of our last board dinners, so I’m reluctantly inclined to agree with you.

Yeah, when I hear "problem employee" from a higher up I think "I want that guy on my team." Sounds like someone who pisses off management, but is too valuable to fire.
Post reply on HN