Live data from Hacker News

AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1

health.aws.amazon.com

301–310 of 1001 posts

Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1

#301
post #288

It's fun to see SRE jumping left and right when they can do basically nothing at all. "Do we enable DR? Yes/No". That's all you can do. If you do, it's a whole machinery starting, which might take longer than the outage itself. They can't even use Slack to communicate - messages are being dropped/not sent. And then we laugh at the South Koreans for not having backed up their hard drives (which got burnt by actual fir…

Signal seems to be dead too though, which is much more of a WTF?

Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1

#307

LOL making one db service a central point of failure, charge gold for small compute instances. Rage about needing Multi AZ, make the costs come onto the developer/organization. But, now fail on a region level, so are we going to now have multi-country setup for simple small applications?

Just don't buy it if you don't want it. No one is forced to buy this stuff.

Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1

#308

Their status page ( https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status ) says the only disrupted service is DynamoDB, but it's impacting 37 other services. It is amazing to see how big a blast radius a single service can have.

It's not surprising that it's impacting other services in the region because DynamoDB is one of those things that lots of other services build on top of. It is a little bit surprising that the blast radius seems to extend beyond us-east-1, mind. In the coming hours/days we'll find out if AWS still have significant single points of failure in that region, or if _so many companies_ are just not bothering to build in re…

I'm real curious how much of AWS GovCloud has continued through this actually. But even if it's fine, from a strategic perspective how much damage did we just discover you could do with a targeted disruption at the right time?

Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1

#309

As this incident unfolds, what’s the best way to estimate how many additional hours it’s likely to last? My intuition is that the expected remaining duration increases the longer the outage persists, but that would ultimately depend on the historical distribution of similar incidents. Is that kind of data available anywhere?

To my understanding the main problem is DynamoDB being down, and DynamoDB is what a lot of AWS services use for their eventing systems behind the scenes. So there's probably like 500 billion unprocessed events that'll need to get processed even when they get everything back online. It's gonna be a long one.

[dead]

Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1

#310
post #210

Their status page ( https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status ) says the only disrupted service is DynamoDB, but it's impacting 37 other services. It is amazing to see how big a blast radius a single service can have.

AWS engineers are trained to use their internal services for each new system. They seem to like using DynamoDB. Dependencies like this should be made transparent.

Not "like using", they are mandated from the top to use DynamoDB for any storage. At my org in the retail page, you needed director approval if you wanted to use a relational DB for a production service.
Post reply on HN