Earlier quoted context omitted.
A 25% margin is pretty good, and companies aren't hitting the limit currently.
The 7 publicly listed health insurers have ~2% profit margins, with the exception of UNH at 6%, but that is due to its healthcare provider business earning higher margins. The other insurers are almost all non profit (various BCBS affiliated insurers, Kaiser, Providence, etc).
The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'
301–310 of 354 posts
Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here are the magic words in US Health Care: "What is the cash price?" It's usually less than you think and often worth avoiding the insurance company hassle. Then you can just get reimbursed with your FSA or HSA anyway.
FSAs are insane, conceptually. "Guess how much money you're spending in a year on healthcare! But beee caaareful: if you guess too high, YOU LOSE IT" I still used mine while I still had access to one, but it was grumpy-making and was usually almost more trouble than it was worth.
Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
The 7 publicly listed health insurers have ~2% profit margins, with the exception of UNH at 6%, but that is due to its healthcare provider business earning higher margins. The other insurers are almost all non profit (various BCBS affiliated insurers, Kaiser, Providence, etc).
Not sure what the relevance of that is. If anything, small profit margins just further incentivize trying to pay out less.
Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
> An insurance company's only goal nowadays is to make as much money as possible How can that be true when their profits are capped on collected premiums? Look up the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) rule to see what I'm referring to. If you wanted to squeeze money out of people, health insurance would be the least appealing industry to do that in since you're required to spend 80-85% of premiums on medical care.
Let me tell you about this little thing called Hollywood accounting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting
The only thing Hollywood accounting does is affect poorly written contracts between businesses.
Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'
#305But who is to say that it should cost $175? What if it really should be $125?
It’s the people and patients caught in the middle
Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t understand why any decision maker in any business in the USA chooses to offer their employees (and hence themselves) health FSAs at all, especially when the much superior in every way Fidelity HSA is available.
All the FSA money in your account is available immediately at the beginning of the year. Ironically that would make it a better choice for anyone with a lot of medical expenses on an HDHP if it wasn’t for the fact that FSAs are capped by law. As someone who does deal with enough medical stuff to clear the deductible (and sometimes the OOP max) on their normal health plan annually, it’s still much more convenient, aga…
Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s deeply frustrating that the $12 doesn’t go towards the deductible. I just saved the insurer a bunch of money!
You did nothing from their point of view except waive having them cover the claim, thusly leaving more money on their hands to be managed longer. Your "price discovery" isn't something they aren't aware of. On the contrary, their surveillance/clinical team have been crunching the numbers and making unilateral decisions on how the population is best guided to drugs based on their bottom line benefit to the insurer. Yo…
Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
All the FSA money in your account is available immediately at the beginning of the year. Ironically that would make it a better choice for anyone with a lot of medical expenses on an HDHP if it wasn’t for the fact that FSAs are capped by law. As someone who does deal with enough medical stuff to clear the deductible (and sometimes the OOP max) on their normal health plan annually, it’s still much more convenient, aga…
My HSA money is also available in the first pay period of the calendar year. It’s up to the employer to decide when they want to contribute it.
HSA is funded as you go
Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t understand why any decision maker in any business in the USA chooses to offer their employees (and hence themselves) health FSAs at all, especially when the much superior in every way Fidelity HSA is available.
I've never seen the point of HSAs, either. The only benefit is the tax difference. There are (usually unknown, unstated upfront) plan fees that eat into that, and coupled with the higher deductibles and worse plan coverage, you're going to pay more out of pocket. It's never been clear to me if (higher OOP + plan fees) And it's a time suck.
Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
"What is the cash price?" magically puts you back in the land of Classical Capitalism, where the service provider wants to keep you as a customer and knows their internal costs and you as a consumer of the service can evaluate their reputation for quality and cost vs other providers. It's adding 3rd parties like "insurance" (which only works as insurance in very limited catastrophic circumstances) and government plan…
Are you calling it the magical land because it doesn't exist? I doubt your doctors office can commit a cash price for the lab they sent you blood too. And try doing that at a hospital and see where it gets you
Why the hell not?
This is not a difficult problem to solve under the "Classical Capitalism" model.