Live data from Hacker News

Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

reviews.ofb.biz

301–310 of 801 posts

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Most of the other examples in the article also apply, but to be honest I've been using GNOME in parallel for years now and I consider it to be my "forever desktop" if PC hardware can ever match Apple Silicon (or, most likely, if I want something that is _just a computer_). I'm there as well. I've been really enjoying desktop Linux lately, but I can't go back to a non-Apple laptop at this point. There's just nothing…

As a former Mac user, I'm really happy with my System76 linux laptops. The only tradeoff is the terrible built-in speakers. My Lemur is lighter and has better battery life than my Macbook Air and has been bulletproof despite my ill treatment. Each of my Macs, however, have had various hardware failures or the famous keyboard recall on the horrible touchbar Macbook Pro. I also prefer matte screens to glossy, so that's…

I have found this old comment:

* Battery life is a lie, especially since it drains almost as much battery closed as it does open.

...

Overall, I think I am probably going to switch back to a macbook after this, not being able to go a day without charging and your laptop always being on low battery is a bit anxiety inducing.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38206173

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#302
Author calls out some truly irritating defects, and Messages is rife with them. But there are bigger ones in that application on both Mac OS and iOS.

Topping the shitlist has to be the inexplicable splitting of group threads for random people in the group, even when everyone is using an iPhone. Suddenly someone in the group gets the messages by him or herself and can't reply to the group. And this occasionally also happens in one-on-one threads: I've had years-old (maybe decades-old) threads suddenly split off into a new one with a friend of mine for no apparent reason.

There's some fundamental incompetence in Message's design, and I'm sure that the addition of RCS has made it worse because it was slapped onto a rotten core.

Oh yeah, then there's the way Messages (or, to be fair, iOS) loses all of your contacts' names if you travel outside the country. This is another brain-dead defect: Just because you're in a new country code, your iPhone suddenly can't associate U.S. numbers with your contacts. How the hell does this go unfixed for one major iOS revision, let alone 15+ years?

Oh yeah, then there's the way Calendar "helpfully" changes the times on your appointments when you travel... meaning that you'll miss all of them if you travel east, because your phone will move them hours later. I mean... who lives like that? I you're going to London on business and the next day you have a meeting at 10 a.m., your iPhone will "helpfully" change that meeting to, say, 5 p.m.

So when the author muses about whether Apple developers ever actually use this stuff in the real world, the only logical answer is no. Or they just take so little interest in the functional quality of their product that they just check in some grossly defective trash and call it a day... and refuse to fix it year after year.

Or... they're not given time and resources to fix it. I'm pretty gentle when filing bugs about Xcode, because I'm sure they are understaffed. But at this point, the neglect has (or should have) exhausted every developer's patience.

Which brings us to a bit of hypocrisy in the post: "Apple is clearly behind on the AI arms race"

NO. Apple's sad capitulation to armchair "industry observers" and "analysts" has contributed greatly to the very defects the guy complains about. Apple should not have jumped on the "AI" hype in the first place. It does not serve Apple's product line or market. They are not a search company or gatekeeper to huge swaths of the Internet. If they wanted to quietly improve Siri and get it RIGHT, fine. But now they're embarrassed, and resources that should have been spent on QA have been squandered on bullshit "AI" that failed.

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#303
post #230
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Using search as a UI is admitting the UI sucks. It is indicative of a failure, not a solution in and of itself.

Just like System Settings in macOS! Always have to use keyword search in that thing. FWIW, search as a UI isn't a bad thing, Cmd + Space is the main way I launch apps on macOS (or Win + "type whatever").

Search feels to me like a good compromise between memorizing terminal commands (including the correct set of parameters to do what you want) and navigating through a UI to find what you're looking for.

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#304
post #32

I'm done with macOS, I've migrated to Linux for my general purpose computing. With every new release of macOS, Gatekeeper is becoming harder and harder to bypass, increasing Apple's control over what software can be run on macOS, forcing apps to be signed with an Apple Developer ID. While I'm happy they are taking security seriously, I'm seriously creeped out that macOS sends hashes of every executable I run to their…

I understand and appreciate the sentiment, but I see the intent very differently. Apple is not employing a frog boiling strategy, but rather being responsive to an increasingly sophisticated adversary. It’s like criticism of the quality of Google search dropping. It has absolutely tanked, but it’s not because the algorithm is worse, it’s because the internet has grown orders of magnitude and most of it uses the same…

Of course Google's algorithm is worse. Google prioritises showing you search results that make money for Google. Google has no incentive to show you anything else.

I can't believe I even have to say this out loud. Look up enshittification.

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#305
post #10

There are some factual "gaps" there about how good Snow Leopard was, but I understand the sentiment. As someone who's been a Mac user since System 6 and has been consistently using Macs alongside PCs _daily_ for over 20 years I can say that Apple's software quality (either in terms of polish or just plain QA) has steadily decreased. It's just that me and other old-time switchers have stopped complaining about it and…

Spotlight was never useful, because of an absurd and glaring design defect: It doesn't show you WHERE it found stuff. There's no path shown with hits. Same blunder in Finder's search, and you can't even optionally add "path" as a column. WTF. So... when the hits include six identically-named files, you can't eliminate ones that you know are wrong (on a backup volume or whatever). The level of stupidity here is just m…

> There's no path shown with hits

I guess you do know the path is shown at the bottom of the window if you select the filename in the list of results?

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#306
Look snow leaopard actually added the hugest feature ever, grand central dispatch. That’s what billy always dreamed about (concurrent windows) and that is what rust craze is about, adding the same to Linux/windows. Like Apple said, snow leopard was under the hood changes. So don’t you worry you will get your snow sequoia, the ai reorganisation is exactly that.

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly. People don't want animojis, and they don't want other trite new features that only seem to exist because Apple feels it needs to demo something new every year. What they want is something that just works without annoyances, distractions, failures, or complications. Give them that and they'll break down the doors trying to get their hands on it, because it's so far from how most tech works today.

Animojis really feel like peak corporate board asking, "What do the kids like these days?" and dumping that shit into the world. Honestly ... AVERAGE age of the Apple board is 68!! This is a company that's reached some sort of corporate red giant stage where it's influence is massive but it's ability to grow is over and it's only real purpose is to generate heavy metals and seed them throughout the rest of the univer…

To be fair, I'd wager the average of nearly all Fortune 500 companies boards hovers around the 65 mark

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Open Settings, scroll down to Spotlight. Unselect the things you don’t want. You’re welcome :-)

Just noticed that I was sharing my entire Safari, Spotlight and Siri search history in that menu. Why is that setting in Spotlight settings and not under Privacy/Analytics?

Because spotlight indexing is local and not shared with Apple?

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and there is no longer any way to effectively prioritize the results I want (apps, not internet garbage) OMG this one drives me bonkers. If anyone out there knows how to turn off internet results, please share!

Open Settings, scroll down to Spotlight. Unselect the things you don’t want. You’re welcome :-)

Thanks!

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#310
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand that you're doing it on principle, but for a software development team, 99$/year is a really minuscule price to pay to be able to build / notarise / distribute software. Developers pay exorbitant amount of money for much lesser value, and the idea of putting your teammates at risk to stick it to apple is kind of sad bordering with negligence from a business POV.

The principle is what matters. The amount is not the issue. The issue is that there is a cost at all. "It's so cheap" is never an excuse for charging for something that should be free. In this case, running software you have no intent to charge for, on your computer. It's as if someone started charging $0.01/month for breathable air. "But $0.01 is trivial," would not excuse it.

Actually the cost is not the issue (you are paying for it one way or the other), the issue is the authorization to do such an action on your (supposedly) own hardware.
Post reply on HN