Live data from Hacker News

Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

twitter.com

301–310 of 433 posts

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#301
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They want money, they’re riding the hype wave, not advancing anything and I’m sure most or all know it.

" Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. " https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Fair, sorry, thanks.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#303
post #240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> My guard will have to be up so much, all the time, I actually don't think it will even be healthy to "consume content" anymore. Why live a life where almost everything I see can be a lie? Makes me not want to use any of this anymore. While I generally agree with your whole comment, I feel like this part has been true for years on social media well before AI generated content hit the scene.

True, and we can go back to any type of media who always have a bias, but overall it just feels different. On one hand, humans writing and humans communicating, even if they have an agenda, is one thing. On the other hand, machines writing and machines communicating is a different level. Maybe I am overall in a bad mood regarding all this, but this recent article https://time.com/7026050/chatgpt-quit-teaching-ai-essa…

Yeah that's a good point. It's not so much that it was already happening before, but it's the shear quantity of it. People have been doctoring images for political gain for forever, but that at least took some photoshop skills. Now anyone can just pop out thousands of misinformation photos, articles, and even now videos in a few hours.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Internet equivalent of pre-war steel: https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel

And it's hard to fully trust any post 2021 text as well. It's pushing me to seek information from pre 2021 books for information.

Until the AI generated book is published and the AI generated websites all tell you it was published in 2014.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#305

Drives me nuts. The internet is dead. I just bought a home and I have been googling the best way to tackle certain home improvement projects - like how to prepare trim for painting. Virtually every result is some kind of content farm of AI-generated bullshit with advertising between every paragraph, an autoplay video (completely unrelated) that scrolls with the page, a modal popup asking me to accept cookies, a secon…

Owner/builder here, of a 1939 home. I invested in a home reference library part way through my own improvements; I should have done it before even lifting a screwdriver. Renovations (https://www.bookfinder.com/search_s/?title=Renovation%205th%...), from Taunton Press, is the first source I consult when starting a home improvement project. Chapter 18 is all about painting. Many of the other titles from Taunton are excellent, but Renovations is unmatched in it's coverage.

All of the flat white MDF trim you buy is primed and ready for painting, too.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#306
post #28

Google is going to have to solve for this somehow if they want to remain relevant, right? If searching for an image and generating the image yield the same result, what's the point of image search any more?

Watermarking I think is supposed to be the goal, but I don’t think anyone can think that the web is in anything but managed decline. The AI feeding itself AI will just end it all. I think Platformer describes it best: https://www.platformer.news/google-io-ai-search-sundar-picha... The question is what comes next, and I don’t think anyone has an answer to that.

I think what comes next is interest-based, influencer-moderated, semi-private chat rooms. For example a lot of hobby youtuber have moderated discord servers. My diy 3d printing communities have discord servers. I have a few invite-only discord servers for various circles of friends and family.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"The internet" isn't for or against anything, it's just a vast computer network. It's the humans with an agenda that exploit the internet (specifically the web) that are against you.

You're correct of course leptons, but do please give credence to important shorthand. As I've put it before, the Internet is the battleground. Ground is not necessarily "neutral". It favours certain forces and tactics. See the "Nine Situations" [0] We used to occupy type-5 (open ground) which was also mostly type-2 (dispersive). We are now on "serious" and "difficult" ground. Therefore the environment itself is hosti…

If you replace "the internet" with "web browsers", you would be correct. "The internet" doesn't care what bits and bytes travel through it, nor who uses it.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#308
post #249
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

digital signatures?

But I can generate something with AI and then sign it myself and say "I wrote it, pinky promise". Since most people don't write anything on the internet, I can pay people $5 to use their signature and operate a "sign farm". Look at the effort these people go though to send their spam.

You can fix this at a hardware level with Cameras. This will, at least, save the most harmful kind of lying. Where real-looking photos and videos are used to defame real people.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#309

Almost all of the "product X vs Y" results are AI ramblings now. This growth of the dead Internet is making me want to sign up for Kagi. We're going to need a certification for human generated content at some point.

human-verified content is going to be the next billion dollar company.

This issue in terms of cost is that if you want this to be truly human-verified for real, you're gonna have to dip into the real world.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#310

Almost all of the "product X vs Y" results are AI ramblings now. This growth of the dead Internet is making me want to sign up for Kagi. We're going to need a certification for human generated content at some point.

> We're going to need a certification for human generated content at some point. People keep saying this and I keep warning them to be careful what they wish for. The most likely outcome is that "certification of human generated content" arrives in the form of remote attestation where you can't get on the internet unless you're on a device with a cryptographically sealed boot chain that prevents any untrusted code fr…

There's ways to do this without destroying anonymity. Ideally, you verify you're human by signing up for some centralized service in real-life, maybe at the post office or something. And then people can ask this service if you're real by providing your super-long rotating token. So, just like an existing IDP but big.
Post reply on HN