Live data from Hacker News

Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

neilzone.co.uk

301–310 of 377 posts

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#301
post #142

Apple added the same thing for iMessage/SMS. It worked as expected if the group message was all Apple users. But if you were the unfortunate person outside the ecosystem, you would get spammed with ‘{person} liked “{message}”’. In some cases, people would react to the reaction leading to some ridiculous chains of text.

I like how you word this in the past tense, it still happens to this day. I live outside the states but keep a google voice number and in my family's group chat I still get these all the time. I've mostly (miraculously) moved them to Signal, but they revert to their SMS ways occasionally.

I no longer get those messages in the default SMS app on my Pixel 8. Either google or apple updated something, they now show as emojis on the original message as intended.

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> When you block an email the sender will get a notification email from their mail server that their message was blocked And if that blocked message was a reaction I’d assume I can move on: they sent an email, I sent a response, they refused to accept it and then spammed me to boot.

I agree, this is clearly worse, whether it's "your e-mail has been rejected" or "this server is not configured to accept 'reactions'", it's unnecessarily hostile to a user who probably doesn't understand that Microsoft has done something non-standard. And they will probably assume that you don't know what you're doing, because your e-mail doesn't work.

The reaction sender's Exchange server would see it and could decide to not display the rejection to the user, since the Exchange server knows it's "just" a reaction that was rejected.

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really miss the days when people put time and thought in to their SSIDs instead of using the defaults

Mine is "go fuck yourself" so whenever anyone asks what my wifi is, it results in a hilarious exchange.

And the password is either "figure it out for yourself", "check the packaging", "try 123456 backwards", or "I don't know"?

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From that article: > (So if you want to opt out of Google Maps and Wi-Fi Sense at the same time, you must change your SSID of, say, myhouse to myhouse_optout_nomap. Technology is great.) I knew about the Google Maps thing, I didn't know about this. That kind of stuff is so presumptuous and user hostile it's outrageous.

Yep. My WiFi has had _optout_nomap ever since it was introduced. People always ask me why and I've never seen another SSID with it included.

I saw a _nomap once! Mentioned it to those around me and nobody knew what it was of course. Must admit I didn't know of optout until now either

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if tech nostalgia has reached the point where someone has built a Club Penguin chat clone.

Oh no, the truth is worse than I imagined: https://www.businessinsider.com/disney-shuts-down-club-pengu...

Reminds of of the Chris Morris movie Four Lions, in which the would-be terrorists use a similar kids side called Puffin Party to coordinate.

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#307
post #185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because this is Microsoft we shall apply Gates' razor and must thus conclude that "never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by malice".

What you're thinking of is called Grey's Law: "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from Malice"

> Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from Malice"

OP didn't mistake anything, this would be a public office clerk and they don't have private jets nor yachts.

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#308

I kind of get why we don’t like this in email, but for SMS and Slack I’ve thoroughly enjoyed reactions. They’re a way to say “I received this and have a positive reaction to it, with no further communication necessary”. Replaces a lot of useless typing I had to do to sound polite when saying “fine, no further comment”. And then getting a notification from the other party acknowledging my acknowledgment… yuck.

My friend interned at the FAA 20 years ago. He said the norm there was to write "Concur without comment." I thought that was brilliant. Of course, when I use it in conversation, no one gets my reference and thinks I am weird. But that is going to happen anyway.

ack

Re: Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by adding a postfix header

#309
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's using Word to render html. They tried using a browser engine but then it rendered a copy-pasted Word text differently and users hated that.

Now that they are transitioning the desktop version of Outlook into an Electron-like webview, I suppose showing HTML directly in the webview is out of the question, and they must be using the Javascript version of Word to render HTML...

If you ever though nobody had an use-case for WASM...
Post reply on HN