Live data from Hacker News

Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

arstechnica.com

301–310 of 582 posts

Re: Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

#301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Such a system exists. You can publish a book and give it away freely. But few do. This is book communism and fails for the same reasons as regular communism. It is in nobody’s interest to do any hard work. If you don’t reward great effort, virtually nobody provides it." Why does open source / free software exist then? "Nobody puts in hard word if it's not rewarded" hasnt the cURL guy been maintaining cURL/libcurl fo…

> "Nobody puts in hard word if it's not rewarded" hasnt the cURL guy been maintaining cURL/libcurl for decades and gets paid nothing? If you replace "nobody" with "very few people" then the statement is mostly true. The vast majority of open source software is crap. Sure, a lot of it is passion projects made by enthusiasts, and there's nothing wrong with that from an artistic hobbyist standpoint, but the quality of t…

A lot of paid software is crap too.

Re: Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

#302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If Star Trek Replicators were invented today, we're so stupid we'd outlaw them. You're so optimistic to think the law would even be this fair. More like limit access to corporations as "the only custodians responsible enough to wield them", while still allowing the developing world to starve and further increasing their profit margins simultaneously to decreasing working wages and employment levels.

Hah some Ferengi actually did this in an episode of TNG! They showed up on a random planet with a replicator and then used their ability to produce anything as a means to subjugate the population.

A script writer can make any fantasy appear to be workable.

Re: Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

#303
post #190
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's no reason that "selling copyrights" needs to a be a thing. If the author themself wants to profit from their work, sure, but once they die, that's it, and there's no excuse for it to not be in the public domain at that point.

Lets change from "selling" to "assigning". Could you assign the copyrights to a corporation (that then doesn't die). Would that prevent them from going into the public domain? If I write some software and assign its copyright to the Apache Foundation or FSF or some other organization through a CLA, what happens to the license if I kick the bucket tomorrow? For that matter, what happens if I don't assign its copyright…

What do you think was the real reason for all the remakes of Disney movies that happened the last decade?

Copyright terms were running out.

Also, by your logic, every contributor of a project, contemporary or previously, must die in order for the "GPL losing its teeth".

Re: Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

#304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t really understand this logic. Are you saying that multi generational projects are… well I don’t really know what you’re saying. When the world was dominated by the divine right of kings, and changing that was going to take hundreds of years… should people not have discussed what to do to move down a better path? My plan as a robotics engineer is to prove that open source robotics can be a viable industry by b…

I think yours is a noble goal that many do share, even if they don't openly express it.

Thank you, that means a lot to me.

Re: Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

#305
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can't agree. Even as recent as about one decade ago, the best way to learn a programming language is often buying a book or checking out a book from the library, because that's the only high-quality source on the topic. Since then we have had people creating complete tutorials like the Rust book and distribute it on the Internet, for free. In the US, some professors profit from selling textbooks that get updated ever…

> the professors are literally practicing communism and giving away the book for free No, that's more like potlatch. "Book communism" would be if authors owned the printing presses. (Or maybe if printing press technicians owned the printing presses.)

Well, if its an ebook and you own the server, you own the printing press and the bookshop.

Re: Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

#307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hah some Ferengi actually did this in an episode of TNG! They showed up on a random planet with a replicator and then used their ability to produce anything as a means to subjugate the population.

I believe that was Voyager and the Ferengi were stranded in the delta quadrant after the incident with the stable-on-one-end wormhole in TNG. Imo it wasn’t the worst strategy in their situation. https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/False_Profits_(episode)

Oooh you’re so right thank you!

Re: Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

#308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Nobody puts in hard word if it's not rewarded" hasnt the cURL guy been maintaining cURL/libcurl for decades and gets paid nothing? If you replace "nobody" with "very few people" then the statement is mostly true. The vast majority of open source software is crap. Sure, a lot of it is passion projects made by enthusiasts, and there's nothing wrong with that from an artistic hobbyist standpoint, but the quality of t…

A lot of paid software is crap too.

I didn't state otherwise, and I'm not sure how that's relevant to my point.

Re: Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

#309

There is no greater folly of contemporary human society than the purposeful restriction of such vast and easily shareable repositories of knowledge. Perhaps these schemes made sense in the past but with the advent of the internet and independent groups willing to fund all hosting fees, we should move to models of publishing that do not require this restriction of information. Library genesis exists but necessarily mu…

> There is no greater folly of contemporary human society than the purposeful restriction of such vast and easily shareable repositories of knowledge. This is exactly how people stayed in power. Knowledge is power, so keep the masses uneducated so they are subservient. I once asked an Englishman why if the British Empire was so great did all of its colonies revolt against it. His response was not what I expected when…

> Knowledge is power

Actually, knowledge is freedom.

> so keep the masses uneducated so they are subservient

Terror makes them subservient. See the Soviet Union's gulags, full of educated people.

Re: Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

#310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Chinese cars? really? They are at best a hazard. The Chinese government dumped tons of money into every one of those cars, they are being sold at a loss. Not because it's good for any one, rather because china fucked up. Every single one of those cars is a state funded fire hazard about to go on the road. EDITL: cause looking up data is hard apparently: western data: https://www.edmunds.com/electric-car/articles/elec…

The problem is the wheels fall off in a fender bender and there's only a 50% chance the airbags will deploy when needed.

At least the steering wheel doesn’t fall off while you’re driving:

https://techcrunch.com/2023/03/08/tesla-under-investigation-...

Post reply on HN