Earlier quoted context omitted.
In my experience, people who randomly bring up complaints about J. K. Rowling in discussions about other topics tend to be trans-activists rather than gender critical people.
Not, however, when they're explicitly condemning trans activists.
Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018)
301–310 of 358 posts
Re: Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018)
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I have never been accused of being a racist transphobe whatever, if that’s your number one issue with the site maybe some inward reflection is in order Perhaps you simply haven't encountered the kind of person who, at the vaguest sense of an opportunity to claim the title of Most Moral Person, will leap up to condescend you based on the most uncharitable and motivated reading of your words.
If one person calls you an asshole, then they might be an asshole. If everyone calls you an asshole, then some inward reflection is in order because you're likely coming off as an asshole. If it happens again and again, in different circles with different people, like GP indicates happens, then maybe, just maybe it's not everyone else that's the problem.
If I think AITA subs and similar communities really aren't very tolerant people at all. Sure, there are people that like to provoke, but I think some subs are just some form of merger of similar people believing themselves to be oh so generous in their judgmentality but in reality are pretty toxic by almost all standards.
Re: Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018)
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
In my experience, people who randomly bring up complaints about J. K. Rowling in discussions about other topics tend to be trans-activists rather than gender critical people.
Not, however, when they're explicitly condemning trans activists.
Re: Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018)
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
The underlying motivation in these sorts of exchanges is rarely a desire for a global increase of genuine self-examination, but more often to exploit an opportunity for ostentatious preening. We know this because your logic can be trivially inverted to point the mirror in the reverse direction. So, reflection being what it is, if self-examination were the true goal, one imagines that those advocating it would at leas…
The underlying motivation is to have assholes take a closer look at themselves instead of continuously blaming those around them for what ultimately is the result of their own actions. If this struck such a nerve with you, then you may want to take a step back and re-evaluate why you're so deeply triggered by people advocating for introspection instead of deflection. It's pretty clear from your comment you won't, but…
Re: Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018)
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Just asking questions" is the biggest red flag of ill intent, its not doubt I would ban someone for resorting to that. Especially if we look at the facts given in the comment. " saying at the time we didn't yet know how many doses and on what schedule of the vaccine would be needed." "I messaged the mods to explain that I was triple-vaxxed " So we can infer from this post that this happened sometime after Aug 2021.…
> "Just asking questions" is the biggest red flag of ill intent I consider the playing of the accusation of the JAQ wildcard (an immediate victory in the minds of some subsets of observers) to be a much more dangerous (often literally unrealizeable) cultural norm, it is a go to staple technique in any delusional internet rhetorician's toolkit.
Re: Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018)
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
asking questions is also a well-known tactic for getting information. how do you figure out there's ill intent?
Like everything else in life, by using contextual clues and judging the content of the questions. It's quite obvious when someone asks you questions with ill intent.
You believe the example was asked in bad faith? I heavily doubt it, it is a pure insinuation. I believe you are just walrussing here.
edit: Never mind, "walrussing" allegedly does exist. But I believe the criticism still can be understood.
Re: Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018)
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://amp.knowyourmeme.com/memes/am-i-so-out-of-touch Reddit is not one person, you understand that right? If multiple people on different parts of Reddit are telling you you’re an asshole— something I explicitly called out— then Occam’s Razor says that you are, in fact, the asshole.
I think we both know that Reddit has a certain political viewpoint, so let’s not pretend that we don’t. The meme certainly applies, but not in the way you think it does. If it’s only Reddit that finds many people’s behaviour objectionable Occam’s Razor would determine that Reddit is the problem.
Bullshit.
Reddit is made up of millions of people with different viewpoints. There are subreddits that are left leaning, centrist, right leaning, and everything in between. And many, many more which have no political viewpoint because they literally have nothing to do with politics.
To claim an entire user base has a “certain political viewpoint” is plainly ignoring the reality of the situation.
It certainly is a great strawman but it’s in no way shape or form representative of reality.
I’m going to ignore the rest of your comment because you clearly can’t conceptualize the basic idea that Reddit is not one mind. Come back to me when this most basic of concepts has sunk in and we can have an actual discussion rather than whatever this idiotic back and forth you’re insisting on is.
Re: Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018)
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like everything else in life, by using contextual clues and judging the content of the questions. It's quite obvious when someone asks you questions with ill intent.
No, it is not obvious at all if you are not able to read minds. It never is and even suggesting bad faith is usually regarded as a faux pas. You believe the example was asked in bad faith? I heavily doubt it, it is a pure insinuation. I believe you are just walrussing here. edit: Never mind, "walrussing" allegedly does exist. But I believe the criticism still can be understood.
Just because you can’t does not make it impossible.
> You believe the example was asked in bad faith?
When, exactly, did I claim that? Show me the exact quote because it doesn’t exist.
Making up things other said is a very obvious way to tell if someone is coming with bad intent.
Re: Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018)
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
The underlying motivation is to have assholes take a closer look at themselves instead of continuously blaming those around them for what ultimately is the result of their own actions. If this struck such a nerve with you, then you may want to take a step back and re-evaluate why you're so deeply triggered by people advocating for introspection instead of deflection. It's pretty clear from your comment you won't, but…
You just made the point of the previous poster and you judge quickly. Allegedly in the interest of others, but I believe you are fooling yourself.
Re: Digg's v4 launch: an optimism born of necessity (2018)
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
If one person calls you an asshole, then they might be an asshole. If everyone calls you an asshole, then some inward reflection is in order because you're likely coming off as an asshole. If it happens again and again, in different circles with different people, like GP indicates happens, then maybe, just maybe it's not everyone else that's the problem.
That is not really good advice. There are frequent mobs that believe others to be assholes. For that matter, I believe you almost always qualify for that if you form that strong opinions about someone from internet comments because that directly reflects on your narrow perspective and you willingness to act on insufficient information. If I think AITA subs and similar communities really aren't very tolerant people at…
> in different circles with different people, like GP indicates happens
But you just chose to ignore it and soldier on with your rambling diatribe.
If people in completely different subs like StarTrek and CanadaCoronavirus and god knows how many others all say someone is an asshole, then the person is just a fucking asshole. That’s all there is to it.
It’s not some big conspiracy caused by “merging of subs” or whatever other BS you and your friends come up with to justify your shitty behavior.
Considering this thread is no longer on the front page and you somehow chose to reply to all my comments and their sibling threads in here, I’m just going to go on a limb to say you’re probably a sock puppet for someone else here. Next time, just use your main account.