Live data from Hacker News

IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

reneweuropegroup.eu

301–310 of 500 posts

Re: IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

#301

Does it annoy anyone else that the title says "Musk's Starlink"? Yes, it was his idea and he is the main driving force and owns half of the company, but any project like this is a collaborative effort between tens of thousands of people.

It doesn't annoy me all that much because that's how things are always framed. Owner/driving force is exactly what matters.

Re: IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

#302
post #264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now that's an indictment! One major outage in nearly a decade. Better write off the whole programme as a waste of money. Meanwhile the whole US government gets shut down seemingly every other year.

Has GPS ever experienced a major outage in its ~30 years of operation?

Not that I know of. What's your point?

Re: IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

#303

This is probably something that the US (or other major powers) should really think about doing too. Military tactics and capabilities have generally been driven by communications capabilities. For example, radio communication technology was at least as important as the tank in for the German blitzkrieg. This becomes all the more important with drones, etc. I just punched up some quick numbers to make sure I’m not tal…

[dead]

Re: IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

#304

This is probably something that the US (or other major powers) should really think about doing too. Military tactics and capabilities have generally been driven by communications capabilities. For example, radio communication technology was at least as important as the tank in for the German blitzkrieg. This becomes all the more important with drones, etc. I just punched up some quick numbers to make sure I’m not tal…

Doesn't the US already have strong contracts with SpaceX? ... of course one can question how safe they are given Musk's condition.

Genuine question, what do you mean by “Musk’s condition”?

Re: IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

#305

This is probably something that the US (or other major powers) should really think about doing too. Military tactics and capabilities have generally been driven by communications capabilities. For example, radio communication technology was at least as important as the tank in for the German blitzkrieg. This becomes all the more important with drones, etc. I just punched up some quick numbers to make sure I’m not tal…

The US already is exploring setting up its own low Earth orbit broadband constellation, upgrading its traditional satellites, and contracting with commercial entities.

https://spacenews.com/dod-satcom-big-money-for-military-sate...

Re: IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

#306

So it seems that each group of nations needs/wants physical networks because it's not enough to use encrypted communication on others'. How many is enough, 3, 4, more? Is this solvable with a single network? e.g. Is there a way of anonymizing users of a network preventing discrimination, analogous to cryptocurrency?

Confidentiality is not enough to claim Security. You also need Availability.

Re: IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

#307
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There was little demand for non-GPS satnav. There is plenty of demand for non-Musk satcom.

For terminally online people, prehaps. But in real life, no, people aren't generally obsessed by twitter drama. Real life usage is what matters, and if it's good enough for the ukrainian army in an active war zone...

It's not good enough for them because Musk seems to be limiting its use in line with his political views.

Re: IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

#308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's honestly got to the point where I barely open comments related to EU projects any more. While most of the time there's somewhat nuanced discussions in comments, once the EU gets mentioned for some reason most of the comments basically boil down to "EU bad, US better", and "Big government bad", completely ignoring the actual contents of what the post it about.

A crowd that is ideological resistant to reality in quite a entertaining fashion. Just remember the Boing 737 Max, which was never explored under this focus. Why does European airbus thrive, while us aircraft industry declined? Both are heavily state subsidized, so it is not that. There is something dysfunctional in us business culture, that extracts value first, and then runs without creating something for the value…

I can’t comment on the broader US/EU perception question, but I would partly attribute Airbus’ success to its harnessing of smaller scale engineering excellence always present in Western European aviation. Airbus merely solved the problem of risk of high scale production which has historically been a challenge for European manufacturers relative to Americans operating in their large, uniform market.

Re: IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

#309
post #251

[flagged]

You are right, though I’d add that the EU correctly reflects Europeans’ policy preferences here. European voters, more often than not, seem to believe they can have their cake and eat it too: free public services that remain competitive and cutting edge, somehow efficiently run by the government and delivered on time and on budget. Ask those same people about how is run, and they’ll have a litany of complaints.

The flip side of it is exploitative large commercial almost-monopolies which do their best to make you spend money you shouldn't on things you don't need. Markets full of almost exactly the same deal dressed up so many different ways that you don't realise you're going to be stiffed any way you go. Cheap initial prices hide very expensive prices later on etc etc.

The amount of effort to evaluate everything and work out where the "catch" is ..... it's just understandable that we might look for our governments to shoulder a bit of that burden in the critical areas. At least our healthcare systems usually help us that way.

Re: IRIS²: The EU’s Response to Musk’s Starlink

#310
post #252
post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I live in the EU, understand how it works, and that's why I hate it, and I want my country out of it ASAP :)

As a British person, I'd suggest you reconsider. Things over here are not so rosy. Drugs shortages, crazy inflation, no discernible benefits at all except to a government that hates judicial oversight of any kind.

"Drugs shortages, crazy inflation"

Sounds precisely like Czechia right now.

Post reply on HN