Earlier quoted context omitted.
Okay, I'm sold, and I'm sorry for being blunt. Where can I learn more? Can you point me at the right place in the source? I'll not be banning Homebrew telemetry.
I understand the desire for privacy, and the seriousness that comes with it! I've linked Homebrew's analytics data and the source code that collects it elsewhere in this thread. And, to be absolutely clear: it is perfectly fine for you to disable Homebrew's analytics. There are an infinite number of legitimate reasons for doing so, including the most basic one of "I just don't want to." My sole goal is to dispel the…
Homebrew 4.0.0
301–310 of 403 posts
Re: Homebrew 4.0.0
#302As an old hand who was around when homebrew started, I feel obliged to let people know there are alternatives. If you find brew's take-over-your-system-and-youll-thank-me approach off putting, and/or you value stability over the coolness factor, MacPorts is still alive and well ( https://www.macports.org ), and in-fact has basically all the same packages brew does. In 18 years of using MacPorts, it's never messed up…
Re: Homebrew 4.0.0
#303Didn't the author sunset this project to become a web3 advocate and pivot to a new project where some dubious NFT would be exchanged for package installations? I guess 2022 came and went since then...
Re: Homebrew 4.0.0
#304Man there are a lot of complaints about this free software no one is forcing you to use. I would start with a thanks to the people who spend a lot of time on this, and probably not for much wealth. I know I greatly appreciate the existence of homebrew.
Re: Homebrew 4.0.0
#305Reminder that nothing in Homebrew has any signing or attempt at supply chain integrity. Now that they are moving away from clients using git, so even git commit signing is off the table now. When you install brew you are giving hundreds of people (or anyone who has access to their Github accounts) full remote code execution on your machine. Never ever use brew on a machine you use to access production.
Re: Homebrew 4.0.0
#306 HOMEBREW_NO_GOOGLE_ANALYTICS
HOMEBREW_NO_ANALYTICS
I hate opt-outs.Re: Homebrew 4.0.0
#307Before this whole threads turns into a misinformed rant fest about opt out telemetry: “Homebrew gathers anonymous aggregate user behaviour analytics using Google Analytics (until our in-progress migration to our own InfluxDB). You will be notified the first time you run brew update or install Homebrew. Analytics are not enabled until after this notice is shown, to ensure that you can opt out without ever sending anal…
Re: Homebrew 4.0.0
#308Time to set HOMEBREW_NO_GOOGLE_ANALYTICS HOMEBREW_NO_ANALYTICS I hate opt-outs.
Re: Homebrew 4.0.0
#309Man there are a lot of complaints about this free software no one is forcing you to use. I would start with a thanks to the people who spend a lot of time on this, and probably not for much wealth. I know I greatly appreciate the existence of homebrew.
Personally, I've moved on. MacPorts is great. More people should use it.
Re: Homebrew 4.0.0
#310As an old hand who was around when homebrew started, I feel obliged to let people know there are alternatives. If you find brew's take-over-your-system-and-youll-thank-me approach off putting, and/or you value stability over the coolness factor, MacPorts is still alive and well ( https://www.macports.org ), and in-fact has basically all the same packages brew does. In 18 years of using MacPorts, it's never messed up…
MacPorts makes no effort to not look abandoned. It's very much 'the old way' of doing things from the look of the website to the terseness of the syntax. Before you take offense, I say this as a member of that generation. These days if you have an ugly website, and opaque syntax, you're considered to be an abandoned project. Agree with it or not, your website sends a signal to the user and MacPort's signal says "it'l…