Earlier quoted context omitted.
> STEM is 100% historically discriminatory to women So that women prefer to pick other fields is STEM's fault?
That women face negative pressure when they go into STEM is a real and documented problem.
Google exec fired after female boss groped him at drunken bash, suit says
301–310 of 535 posts
Re: Google exec fired after female boss groped him at drunken bash, suit says
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Billy Graham/Mike Pence rule is your best bet: don't let yourself be in any situation where a false accusation could arise. Of course you'll be accused of being a sexist/misogynist/whatever instead but that's easier to ignore or overcome than false accusations of sexual harassment.
Hard disagree. If I decide I can have a closed-door 1:1 or a lunch 1:1 with some of my direct reports but not with any that are female, I’m inherently discriminating against them. I’d way rather treat all employees fairly and fade a <1% chance of a false accusation than to treat employees unequally and cut that chance in half.
Re: Google exec fired after female boss groped him at drunken bash, suit says
#303Probably worth noting this story was first published by the New York Post. Take that for what you will. That said, this is a pretty wild turn of events. From the initial and continued sexual harassment/assault to the racism, and subsequent retaliation. More curious is the very direct "your team is too male" and the encouragement to fire someone. I've heard this hinted at before, but never said out loud for obvious re…
>More curious is the very direct "your team is too male" and the encouragement to fire someone. My friend who still lives in the Valley says this kind of sentiment is incredibly common there nowadays, e.g. advertising an open position and having discussions internally that a man won't be hired for the role. It's pretty surprising to me, because statistics show that most major careers have a gender imbalance in one di…
My conspiracy theory is that software engineering is the last real, single, meritocratic, growing career path that costs a lot of money for employers and they'd rather tank the market by making sure the other 50% of sex is able to participate to wreck wages.
Nobody cares that nurses and teachers are majority female dominated fields ripe with discrimination and harassment because they don't make enough money. They're overstressed, understaffed, and underpaid and society needs more of both yet the bar is so low and so biased against men that nobody is even trying to fix it.
Re: Google exec fired after female boss groped him at drunken bash, suit says
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
The ugly truth is — false sexual harassment complaint is one those things in life you keep hoping and praying it never happens to you. But if it does you’re screwed one way or the other. The stigma that it “automatically” brings just doesn’t go away. It just doesn’t. You forever become “that” person. And I really don’t know how it can be fixed. That’s just how it is.
The Billy Graham/Mike Pence rule is your best bet: don't let yourself be in any situation where a false accusation could arise. Of course you'll be accused of being a sexist/misogynist/whatever instead but that's easier to ignore or overcome than false accusations of sexual harassment.
Re: Google exec fired after female boss groped him at drunken bash, suit says
#305Re: Google exec fired after female boss groped him at drunken bash, suit says
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, in civil court. The DA office won't take on false accusations charges. Edit: I could sue her, but nothing will come of it, she's completely broke, alone and live rent free taking care of old lady with dementia. And as of me, idk, never held grudge or wanted any vengeance upon anyone, it's easier to just cut ties, and never be associated with her
You might get somewhere suing the bank if they caused you any harm.
You'd end up costing yourself money, just in the sheer time it would take to do it.
Re: Google exec fired after female boss groped him at drunken bash, suit says
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably like 75% male. But at most 25% white male.
Nope. It’s a lot whiter than u think https://www.eeoc.gov/special-report/diversity-high-tech
"Compared to overall private industry, the high tech sector employed a larger share of whites (63.5 percent to 68.5 percent), Asian Americans (5.8 percent to 14 percent) and men (52 percent to 64 percent"
First point would be that doesn't really support your contention that 90% of tech employees are white men.
That said, they can't be measuring what we think of as tech; it's certainly more than the claimed 64% male. I'm pretty sure that restricted to actual tech, it would be both more male and less white.
Re: Google exec fired after female boss groped him at drunken bash, suit says
#308Re: Google exec fired after female boss groped him at drunken bash, suit says
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.
Aka: Hire anyone except white, heterosexual males.
Re: Google exec fired after female boss groped him at drunken bash, suit says
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I don't know where you did STEM related education, but in my environment a women in a group project would get extra points relative to the rest. So I saw the exact opposite of what you describe. And at work, women seems to rise to management levels easier than men. But hey, this is EU, not US. Edit: you're pointing me to something that happened in 1890? WTF???
You replied to a comment about historically - and what was once a pattern still persists to a lesser degree.
The roots of higher education were laid with the exclusion of women baked in.