> Not only did he lose emails, contact information for friends and former colleagues, and documentation of his son’s first years of life, his Google Fi account shut down, meaning he had to get a new phone number with another carrier. Without access to his old phone number and email address, he couldn’t get the security codes he needed to sign in to other internet accounts, locking him out of much of his digital life.…
One solution to many of these concerns is a periodic backup (via Takeout) of your Google account.
A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
301–310 of 609 posts
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#302My wife is a doctor and received a few of these kind of images in whatsapp from her patients from time to time. Should she be concerned?
Perhaps switch to signal or telegram? Some service that guarantees confidentiality.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
You say that as if there is no other reason to ban alcohol than religious belief, and not like alcohol being one of the most negative societal influences in the areas of human health, crime, public safety, and poverty. Just because humans are so cripplingly addicted to alcohol that banning was untenable doesn’t mean it was a bad idea.
Prohibition didn’t work. Everyone who wanted to kept drinking. Religious guilt is an ineffective motivator of change. Source: human history. It’s time to move on.
>Source: human history.
The alcohol consumption statistics of certain ME states strongly disprove your thesis.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
The reference to $7k isn’t to prosecute a CP case, it was to sue google to reinstate his account so he could get his digital life back.
Which would involve defending his case. The defense's budget has to be in 5he same league as the prosecution.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
My pictures and videos are synced to iCloud, Google Photos, and MS OneDrive. My photos are synced to Amazon Drive too.
Do you use the same email or 2FA for all of those? If so, you still have a potential single point of failure if that provider decides to ban your account.
- iCloud 2FA is another Apple device.
- I don’t care enough about my Google account to have 2FA. Besides the occasional SMS.
- Microsoft 2FA is Microsoft Authenticator.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
The reference to $7k isn’t to prosecute a CP case, it was to sue google to reinstate his account so he could get his digital life back.
Which would involve defending his case. The defense's budget has to be in 5he same league as the prosecution.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
And you can’t even escape these companies by moving to another country. They have their tendrils everywhere, except in places that consciously prevent them - which is usually done by even worse tyrannies like China/Russia. Always makes me laugh when I see employees of Google, Amazon etc. claiming to be “anti-fascist” and “standing in solidarity with the common man” etc etc…
What if I use Huawei phone, which is banned from using Google services? Obviously, China will have all my info, but they can't (yet) ban me from boarding US trains for low social rating, so what do I care?
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don’t block CSAM because “it’s illegal” - in fact, they can’t be forced to do it without it breaking your 4th amendment rights. Instead, all CSAM reporting and blocking is done at-will by these companies, and some don’t participate (Apple[0]), so it’s a policy decision by these companies. I imagine unblocking someone due to them being exonerated by a government entity is legally risky - perhaps doing so would be…
Google isn’t the government, they are a third party who you provide data to. 4th amendment doesn’t apply.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those countries would love to blackmail you. Just encrypt your data rclone would do that.
> Those countries would love to blackmail you based on what? At least is an entire Country that will blackmail me, must think I am really important, not some rando that hacked iCloud to find celebrities boobs and post them online... > Just encrypt your data rclone would do that. yeah, but rclone is an offline backup, basically. cloud storage is for when you need immediate access and search capabilities.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#310My wife is a doctor and received a few of these kind of images in whatsapp from her patients from time to time. Should she be concerned?
WhatsApp images are supposed to be E2E-encrypted, aren't they? Not sure about the whole Google Drive backup, though.