Live data from Hacker News

700M users and Premium

telegram.org

301–310 of 330 posts

Re: 700M users and Premium

#301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

700,000,000 users disagree with your statements. You can’t make something true by just saying it’s true. Also your attitude is super toxic. You’re calling people who don’t value the same things you do, “clueless”. You don’t really get to bullshit people on HN — you can be super smart and skilled in your field, you’ll far too often come across people with vastly more experience than you. I invite you to think about th…

Its not years behind. That's a lie. In fact Id say it's ahead because you don't need to use a phone number (huge liability), you can choose to use e2e if you want and theyre not storing your data in plaintext! Oh and all of matrix is totally open source! Wow. That's how you know you can trust it. If they decide to pull a WhatsApp and move to Facebook, you can just fork and get on with your life. I like that the teleg…

Just because it's open source doesn't mean I can trust it, I don't have the time to audit the code myself. Being open source is not a feature.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's one of the worst Linux desktop programs I use daily. It gets scaling a bit wrong so all the icons look blurry, scrolling in chats regularly breaks (scroll wheel just does nothing but is fine in all other programs), and the one time I tried to video call in it it crashed. Discord's client is much better.

Are you using the Telegram-provided build instead of a distro build? Distro builds of it are often broken IME.

Flatpack and Snap versions both work ok.

I'm using the distro (manjaro) build, which is also pretty good. No idea how good the AUR versions are.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#303
post #231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Neither is WhatsApp. It's a closed source app, no one outside of Meta knows if it is actually encrypted properly.

That's not how it works: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11432661

Nonsense.

The app is closed source. Facebook could be copying all your private keys to their servers and you would never know.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#304
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Neither is WhatsApp. It's a closed source app, no one outside of Meta knows if it is actually encrypted properly.

I always wondered how feasible it is to analyze whatsapp network traffic to test their claims.

I'm sure the traffic is encrypted. But it's trivially easy for Facebook to copy your private key to their servers.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#305
post #231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not how it works: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11432661

Nonsense. The app is closed source. Facebook could be copying all your private keys to their servers and you would never know.

I invite you to read the comment I linked.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#306
post #277
post #231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not how it works: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11432661

That's exactly how it works. You can claim a lot of the day is long when the app is closed source

I invite you to read the comment I linked.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#307
post #297
post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For me, the value of messaging comes 99.99% from availability of people I'm messaging. For work, it's all Slack. For personal it's SMS. I haven't seen a compelling feature in a chat app since 1997.

It's true that if nobody you want to talk to is on it or willing to install it, then it's not of much use. It's also a bit harder to find really compelling features for direct messages. Though even for DMs, outside of Apple's walled iMessage garden, it's hard to get stuff like high quality photos, videos, and audio messages, reactions, stickers, etc that work correctly for everyone on all device types. Group handling…

Everyone keeps saying group. I've never had trouble sending group texts. Both my kids have had their whole classes in a group text for a year. SMS is the one and only "open" messaging platform left so your experience will depend on if you're using iMessage or Samsung or VZ or whatever other ones are out there. But as far as I can tell they're all perfectly fine and nearly indistinguishable.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>...and yes, nobody of them used Secret chats... Pretty much no one does any sort of identity verification anyway on any E2EE messaging system. So that means that the people running the servers can MITM if they feel like it to get the content. So in practice Telegram might be the best of something or another for all it matters. It's sort of a con. Yes our E2EE encryption app is perfectly secure assuming you do this t…

strong second. literally no one cares for the 'secret key of x has changed' on whatsapp, so i might as well enjoy the supperior useability of telegram.

One day I'll write a post about how NL police busted Ironchat and how I discovered their MitM...

Re: 700M users and Premium

#309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Telegram's Linux client is simply Amazing.

It's one of the worst Linux desktop programs I use daily. It gets scaling a bit wrong so all the icons look blurry, scrolling in chats regularly breaks (scroll wheel just does nothing but is fine in all other programs), and the one time I tried to video call in it it crashed. Discord's client is much better.

For what it's worth, Telegram's scaling on windows is also broken. Use it with one 100% and one 200% scaling monitor, on the HDPI everything is too small to read.
Post reply on HN