Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The ban on porn is defensible outside of any moral framework because once you allow porn then all what's left is porn (although it would be useful to think about why that is). Reddit and 8chan allow the creation of pornography subboards and never even approached that state.
That's because they both allow for creation of very segregated sub-groups that don't inherently interact. You won't see a lot of porn on /r/all because Reddit doesn't want you to, even though at least 50% of Reddit is porn, it's just bad for business. It's basically a "mini internet".
Suspended from Google Play for listing supported subtitle formats
301–310 of 342 posts
Re: Suspended from Google Play for listing supported subtitle formats
#302Re: Suspended from Google Play for listing supported subtitle formats
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good - There's a clear theme in the motivations of both major mobile OS companies here: You, a 3rd party developer making custom software products for a mobile platform, are no longer allowed to have customers yourself. Instead you must grovel and beg and pray that our lords Apple/Google consent to allow you to rent their customers. This consent can be revoked at any time, you will pay through the nose for it (20%+ o…
What's currently stopping some third party from creating a fork of Android with a better store? Are there closed-source parts of Android that can't be easily replicated? Is it the difficulty of getting any major phone manufacturers to agree to install it? Or something else or all of the above?
Re: Suspended from Google Play for listing supported subtitle formats
#304I guess the Scunthorpe problem is still a thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scunthorpe_problem
Reminiscent to me of Call of Duty Warzone; it has loadouts which you can give custom names (that only you see!) which are protected with a profanity filter. Comically, some of the literal names of the guns are banned as being profane, like "MP5".
Re: Suspended from Google Play for listing supported subtitle formats
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder, why people suddenly forgot that adblockers are a thing?
Because they like the channels they watch and want them to get ad revenue?
Re: Suspended from Google Play for listing supported subtitle formats
#306Re: Suspended from Google Play for listing supported subtitle formats
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
Definitely. For example, MTBB's subtitles for Kimi no Na wa are very impressive. There's a short showcase of them on YouTube (spoilers): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_c-eKTisI0 It's a shame you basically cannot get anything close to the quality of fansubs from any commercial/legal options.
> It's a shame you basically cannot get anything close to the quality of fansubs from any commercial/legal options. Fansubbers work for the shows they love while the commercial distributors just pick the cheapest option to get the thing done ASAP, don't matter how sh*tty the result is. There is no chance for quality here. The same happens with Blurays x rips streams: piracy is the best option (no DRM, no unskippable…
Case in point, I remember watching "Is the Order a Rabbit S3" in Crunchyroll, the English subtitles are pretty basic but the Portuguese (Brazillian) subtitles are great, including things like Karaoke in opening and ending.
Re: Suspended from Google Play for listing supported subtitle formats
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
And it wasn't true as stated (it didn't happen every time, the server didn't keep any logs, etc.)
>it didn't happen every time True, but it didn't make much difference, since the reports from the thread showed it had a bizarrely short cache time. >the server didn't keep any logs Well, that's the rub isn't, it? Part of privacy-centric design is that you shouldn't have to risk such information being exposed or trust such reassurances; if they don't need the information, they shouldn't get it at all. There are priva…
Re: Suspended from Google Play for listing supported subtitle formats
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
Religion's got nothing to do with it. Racial slurs are a subset of "profanity", and I wager that you support Google's desire to not have apps in their store which prominently feature racial slurs. Every culture has its "bad words" which are forbidden to use in polite company. (Of course the actual app in question is still completely innocent, because Google's vetting process is a trash fire.)
It seems disingenuous to bring up racial slurs in the context of profanity. They're two very different categories, even if they are both subsets of "words that can get you in trouble." As you acknowledge, the app in question was blocked for profanity, not slurs. As parent comment says, profanity seems to be mostly a religious issue. I can say "fuck" on TV, or in my novel, or even in my Hacker News comment. But I doub…
Re: Suspended from Google Play for listing supported subtitle formats
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
>it didn't happen every time True, but it didn't make much difference, since the reports from the thread showed it had a bizarrely short cache time. >the server didn't keep any logs Well, that's the rub isn't, it? Part of privacy-centric design is that you shouldn't have to risk such information being exposed or trust such reassurances; if they don't need the information, they shouldn't get it at all. There are priva…
Short retention according to who? That server only? No copies to the NSA? I’m a trust but verify kind of guy and with just the word of Apple I assume somebody is keeping the data and using it in some way.