Earlier quoted context omitted.
But the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have no "adjuvants". What are you getting at?
They don't have adjuvants, but they do have lipid nanoparticles which allow the mRNA to breach cells. It's feasible that they could cause unexpected side effects. NB: I'm personally going to get the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccine I can get, and I'm incredibly excited about mRNA vaccines in general. But, it's true that any time you inject a chemical into your bloodstream you're taking a calculated risk.
First person receives Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in UK
301–310 of 404 posts
Re: First person receives Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in UK
#302Re: First person receives Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in UK
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah but for how long? Unless Australia is willing to keep screening all arrivals and containing outbreaks indefinitely, Covid is gonna start circulating there at some point.
Qantas (the Australian airline) has already announced that they intend to require COVID vaccination as a condition for boarding international flights: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/world/qantas-covid-19-v... Australia is also not even letting citizens leave the country without special permission. I don't see them loosening up until there's actual herd immunity via vaccination in the country.
Re: First person receives Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in UK
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does it really? Has it been found that a significant source of infections was illegal immigration? Or that without it there would not have already been internal spreading?
Doesn't matter. If you don't have covid, and nobody comes in, you won't get covid. But that's not feasible in most countries. Austrailia and NZ don't rely on a just-in-time cross border economy like the US and Europe. Goods arrive after being on boats which have been off shore for days or weeks. Compare with the US-Canada "border closure", where thousands of trucks, and their drivers, have crossed each way every day…
Or even trailer drop-off and pick-up for no-chance-of-personal-contact changes.
They just choose not to.
Re: First person receives Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in UK
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
10 seconds Googling: https://cbs12.com/news/local/man-who-died-in-motorcycle-cras... Many other stories like that
Maybe you should spend more than 10 seconds Googling? You could, for example, read the story you linked, which states: "Despite health officials knowing the man died in a motorcycle crash, it is unclear whether or not his death was removed from the overall count in the state." So it's a nothing story, with no statement of fact included at all. Just "unclear whether or not" against repeated statements by state officia…
Re: First person receives Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in UK
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don't have adjuvants, but they do have lipid nanoparticles which allow the mRNA to breach cells. It's feasible that they could cause unexpected side effects. NB: I'm personally going to get the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccine I can get, and I'm incredibly excited about mRNA vaccines in general. But, it's true that any time you inject a chemical into your bloodstream you're taking a calculated risk.
Please name a vaccine that is injected into your bloodstream.
Re: First person receives Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in UK
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn't matter. If you don't have covid, and nobody comes in, you won't get covid. But that's not feasible in most countries. Austrailia and NZ don't rely on a just-in-time cross border economy like the US and Europe. Goods arrive after being on boats which have been off shore for days or weeks. Compare with the US-Canada "border closure", where thousands of trucks, and their drivers, have crossed each way every day…
Canada-US could do what they already do with trains: crew change at the border. Or even trailer drop-off and pick-up for no-chance-of-personal-contact changes. They just choose not to.
Re: First person receives Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in UK
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
Canada-US could do what they already do with trains: crew change at the border. Or even trailer drop-off and pick-up for no-chance-of-personal-contact changes. They just choose not to.
That's still orders of magnitude more goods crossing a border without a quarentine period than you get from air freight to Aus/NZ
Canadian cross-border truckers arriving back from ??? USA are largely exempt from quarantine requirements upon return.
Re: First person receives Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in UK
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not giving medical advice but you probably shouldn't be going to A&E for a sprained ankle unless it's very serious or a suspected break. For people who are not ordinarily resident in the UK an A&E admission costs £100-£500 plus any tests and treatment. There's a small amount of margin which is used to offset the cost of recovering the money and the fact that sometimes the bills go unpaid.
I see, so it is not the kind of situation when you need to consider getting mortgage to pay off the medical bill. It was just an example. General advice I heard is that when you can't go to GP and walk-in is either too far away or closed, you can go to A&E or call 111 for instructions.
Re: First person receives Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in UK
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is getting downvotes, but it is at least somewhat correct. > it protects you from the effects of Covid-19, the disease, caused by your body's reaction to the virus. There isn't really evidence either way for this. To quote Nature[1]: "Tests on more than 43,000 people have shown that the Pfizer vaccine is 95% effective at preventing disease" > vaccination doesn't mean you cannot get the virus and spread it around…
How can the vaccine prevent entry of the virus in cells, yet the virus can still replicate? I can’t understand why they state we don’t know, because of how I image viruses and vaccination works. Can someone help me understand this paradox?