Live data from Hacker News

Google .dev domain early access

domains.google

301–310 of 475 posts

Re: Google .dev domain early access

#301

This may sound like an ignorant question, but since Google is pretty aggressive about data collection: If I buy a .dev domain, does that expose me to sending more data to Google?

They run the authoritative nameservers for .dev, so they'll have some information about how much traffic your domain is getting, and from where.

Beyond that (and knowing you own the domain), running the registry doesn't give them any more info than they already get about you & your domain from their other services.

Re: Google .dev domain early access

#302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I register a domain, can google boot me off it at a later year if they don't like my politics? Or do I own the domain with the continuing option to re-register it or transfer to another domain registrar? Does google ultimately own the domains and simply lease them to me with no guaranteed option to continue?

Along those lines, if Google decides I’m a bot or nefarious developer as seems to mistakenly happen on occasion judging from recent hacker news posts, will I then lose my domain name? Or at least access to it? At this point tying any major asset solely to a Google account feels risky.

But don't worry, if a mistake happens, I'm sure you can just call Google's customer service and get it straightened out. Ha!

Re: Google .dev domain early access

#303
post #217

Alphabet has too much cash. They have a well established track record of enthusiastically backing exciting new projects way outside of their core competency just to dump them like hot garbage several years later. They also compete in random new industries each time this happens. It doesn't seem like a smart move to lease a domain from a politically active mega-monopoly that might decide to randomly become your compet…

It's risk management through diversification attempts. Google, like any other large scale extremely successful single product[1] company, hedges market risks in occupying "hot" spaces. Same with MS, Apple and all other giants, even in non-tech. [1] see financial report of the last year (10K). Search for "We operate our business in multiple operating segments. Google is our only reportable segment. None of our other s…

It's kind of amazing that after all this time, they haven't created anything worth reporting outside of the add business.

Re: Google .dev domain early access

#304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I register a domain, can google boot me off it at a later year if they don't like my politics? Or do I own the domain with the continuing option to re-register it or transfer to another domain registrar? Does google ultimately own the domains and simply lease them to me with no guaranteed option to continue?

Along those lines, if Google decides I’m a bot or nefarious developer as seems to mistakenly happen on occasion judging from recent hacker news posts, will I then lose my domain name? Or at least access to it? At this point tying any major asset solely to a Google account feels risky.

I wouldn't lease the domain through Google domains. Use a different registrar --- if possible, one that you'll be able to trust. That registrar will work with the registry of the TLD, which would be google in this case, and has a much better chance of actually resolving issues than if you were a direct customer of Google Domains.

Re: Google .dev domain early access

#306
post #303
post #217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's risk management through diversification attempts. Google, like any other large scale extremely successful single product[1] company, hedges market risks in occupying "hot" spaces. Same with MS, Apple and all other giants, even in non-tech. [1] see financial report of the last year (10K). Search for "We operate our business in multiple operating segments. Google is our only reportable segment. None of our other s…

It's kind of amazing that after all this time, they haven't created anything worth reporting outside of the add business.

In any other area that would be a red flag of “money laundering”.

I am not accusing them of it. Just stating facts.

Re: Google .dev domain early access

#307
post #302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Along those lines, if Google decides I’m a bot or nefarious developer as seems to mistakenly happen on occasion judging from recent hacker news posts, will I then lose my domain name? Or at least access to it? At this point tying any major asset solely to a Google account feels risky.

But don't worry, if a mistake happens, I'm sure you can just call Google's customer service and get it straightened out. Ha!

Paid google products, like google domains, have a 24-hour helpline https://domains.google.com/contactus

I've heard that if you call during the day you get someone who's actually competent, not just some T1 support person.

Re: Google .dev domain early access

#308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I register a domain, can google boot me off it at a later year if they don't like my politics? Or do I own the domain with the continuing option to re-register it or transfer to another domain registrar? Does google ultimately own the domains and simply lease them to me with no guaranteed option to continue?

Along those lines, if Google decides I’m a bot or nefarious developer as seems to mistakenly happen on occasion judging from recent hacker news posts, will I then lose my domain name? Or at least access to it? At this point tying any major asset solely to a Google account feels risky.

And would I have any way to actually reach a human at Google, aside from media heat from a Reddit/HN/etc front page story?

Re: Google .dev domain early access

#309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes because not everyone understands x.y.z and y.x are not owned by same person.

In this particular instance at least, .dev is targeting developers, who do tend to know these things.

“Don’t you guys have phones?”

Re: Google .dev domain early access

#310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure I understand the point here, you're comparing subdomains to TLDs?

Compare and contrast whitehouse.gov and whitehouse.com

A company owning whitehouse.com and a government entity owning whitehouse.gov? I'd call that working as intended.
Post reply on HN