Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is the opposite of comforting
Well it is - one could expect this sort of crap pushed by marketing/bizdev via management but the fact that Mozilla engineers actively collaborated on this is a sign of deep normative inadequacy among the people who are supposed to be the last line of defense against this sort of thing.
Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser
301–310 of 537 posts
Re: Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
The major problem is that they installed an add-on without properly communicating what it was. A somewhat smaller problem but still a big problem is that was an utterly frivolous add-on that shouldn't have been pushed to people who didn't explicitly want it. But the biggest problem is that Mozilla seems to have trouble understanding why any of those two would be a problem, I want my browser vendor to be serious and n…
The major problem was building a feature into the product that allowed for pushing add-ons without users knowledge much less active consent in the first place, there is no benign use for this kind of functionality.
Re: Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
The major problem is that they installed an add-on without properly communicating what it was. A somewhat smaller problem but still a big problem is that was an utterly frivolous add-on that shouldn't have been pushed to people who didn't explicitly want it. But the biggest problem is that Mozilla seems to have trouble understanding why any of those two would be a problem, I want my browser vendor to be serious and n…
The major problem was building a feature into the product that allowed for pushing add-ons without users knowledge much less active consent in the first place, there is no benign use for this kind of functionality.
Re: Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
That tweet sounds like doublespeak, but Directory Tiles really did have some genuinely good ideas mixed in with the bad. I don't know how far we got with it, but one of the ideas was to serve a generic bundle of ads, and then select which ones to display locally, based on an entirely private, client-side analysis of the browser's history. Now, that probably shouldn't have been on the new tab page, and probably not in…
You think because your code is running native you can spy on me better for ad purposes, and that's a feature? That is just tone-deaf.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Edit: we've had to warn you a lot. Continuing to break the guidelines ends in bannage, so please clean up your act.
Re: Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser
#305Many people seem to be shocked because Mozilla installed an add-on automatically. In my opinion, it doesn't really matter since the code is coming from Mozilla - they're building the whole browser, so they could introduce functionality anywhere. If someone distrusts their add-ons, why trust their browser at all? The main question is what behavior is being introduced. I haven't researched deeply, but apparently the ad…
The major problem is that they installed an add-on without properly communicating what it was. A somewhat smaller problem but still a big problem is that was an utterly frivolous add-on that shouldn't have been pushed to people who didn't explicitly want it. But the biggest problem is that Mozilla seems to have trouble understanding why any of those two would be a problem, I want my browser vendor to be serious and n…
I would not care about silly stuff, like say a christmas easter egg. But this wasn't meant as a silly joke.
Re: Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I haven't researched deeply, but apparently the add-on does nothing until the user opts-in on studies. It adds some css to a list of words: https://github.com/gregglind/addon-wr/blob/da464ac8f1c3b0894...
i'm on nightly and the default was to opt me in. that's some shady shit. i'm pissed. mozilla is rapidly burning through over a decade of hard-earned trust and goodwill. i install firefox on other people's machines. i'm not a good user to piss off. am i gonna have to wait for servo to mature and make an unmozillad servo? what a sad reality that would be. this is not the browser we were looking for.
Re: Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser
#307Mozilla takes in about half a billion dollars per year, has anyone considered the consideration for which this money is being paid ?
That's FUD. Mozilla is a 501(c)3 non-profit, and our audited financial statements and IRS Form 990 can be found at https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/foundation/annualreport/
I've never quite understood what each Mozilla does, but AIUI, the Firefox development is all done by Mozilla Corp and the nonprofit does stuff like make those cute videos about how Firefox is going to save the world and make us all smiley and multiethnic.
I've talked to a number of Mozilla employees, and they also seem confused about the relationship between the corp and the foundation.
Re: Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google does a lot of things but they've never betrayed my trust by installing an extension in conjunction with a third party without telling me. Google does track a lot of my data but they provide useful services in exchange, and in addition they make it pretty easy to see what data they have on me. Also Google's data is its competitive advantage so our interest in protecting my data from 3rd parties is aligned. In s…
Thanks, thats the funniest thing I've read all week.
Re: Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looking over [the contributors list][1], looks like the plugin was written entirely by Mozilla employees. So, no "Mr Robot marketing department", as some commenters here have been speculating. [1]: https://github.com/gregglind/addon-wr/graphs/contributors
It's technicality. The description is still: "Looking Glass is a collaboration between Mozilla and the makers of Mr. Robot to provide a shared world experience." It doesn't matter who technically coded it. "Mr Robot marketing department" was obviously deciding about its existence, behavior and content -- if that description is true. But looking at the source of the extension, I find the following URLs inside: https:/…
An art director and copywriter sat in a room together over two days and came up with lots of different ideas to generate PR for Mr. Robot. They presented the ideas to a creative director, who went through the work and picked the one he felt was most suitable. They presented it to the client, who supported the idea.
There would have been some line of communication from the creative agency, whoever owns Mr Robot, a media/PR agency and Mozilla. The idea was bought by the client, had the agency liaise with media/PR, got in touch with Mozilla with an undisclosed donation and the add-on was coded.
Re: Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser
#310Many people seem to be shocked because Mozilla installed an add-on automatically. In my opinion, it doesn't really matter since the code is coming from Mozilla - they're building the whole browser, so they could introduce functionality anywhere. If someone distrusts their add-ons, why trust their browser at all? The main question is what behavior is being introduced. I haven't researched deeply, but apparently the ad…
If this were the first incident, and they quickly backtracked on it, then maybe we can give them a pass. But this isn't the first case of somewhat shady behavior. Remember the "user-enhancing" sponsored tiles a few years ago? https://twitter.com/dherman76/status/433320156496789504 > Excited to share the launch of @mozilla @firefox Tiles program, the first of our user-enhancing programs The problem there wasn't just t…
Mozilla's job is to find ways to push the web forward in ways that respect humans, and ads are, well, how the web mostly gets funded. So it's entirely within bounds for them to try to figure out ways to make ads work without invading people's privacy.