Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh? The volatility is a HUGE problem for bitcoin as a currency. If I run a small business, accepting payment in bitcoin just creates risk. The state of my business not only depends on the quality and success of my product/service but also on the volatility of bitcoin because by accepting bitcoin I am forced to effectively take a long position on BTC. The price could crash by 25% before I sell the bitcoin and now I've…
Do many Bitcoin boosters even care about BTC becoming a currency any more? Seems it has achieved much more success as a frenzied medium of global speculation than it ever dreamed of as a stable digital currency.
Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
301–310 of 412 posts
Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh? The volatility is a HUGE problem for bitcoin as a currency. If I run a small business, accepting payment in bitcoin just creates risk. The state of my business not only depends on the quality and success of my product/service but also on the volatility of bitcoin because by accepting bitcoin I am forced to effectively take a long position on BTC. The price could crash by 25% before I sell the bitcoin and now I've…
How does one take a short position in Bitcoin?
Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh? The volatility is a HUGE problem for bitcoin as a currency. If I run a small business, accepting payment in bitcoin just creates risk. The state of my business not only depends on the quality and success of my product/service but also on the volatility of bitcoin because by accepting bitcoin I am forced to effectively take a long position on BTC. The price could crash by 25% before I sell the bitcoin and now I've…
How does one take a short position in Bitcoin?
Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
A Lightning Network transaction results in one of two things - a proof that a certain amount of bitcoins can be withdrawn at any time (minus some delay), or a proof of cheating. Surely a proof that you can withdraw a certain amount of bitcoins is more-or-less equivalent to that many bitcoins, and therefore any rational actor - including your suppliers - should accept it as such? This isn't equivalent to unconfirmed t…
I think it is worth pointing out that it is not exactly equivalent, in the sense that if you pay Steam via a payment channel (for simplicity, a one-directional payment channel, so they don't need to lock up any cryptocurrency themselves), they don't need to settle on-chain, but if they don't do so they cannot use the "money" the received from you to pay someone else (eg their lawyer). In the very long term, if we get…
They certainly can if their lawyer is also on the Lightning Network.
Eventually all Bitcoin wallets should support on-chain and Lightning Network transactions, and seamlessly pick one or the other depending on the transaction amount.
Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
The volatility alone wouldn't be a huge problem if the transactions were quick, apart from having to constantly re-price the goods (not a big deal with an automated system selling digital downloads, even though it is a real PITA for the accounting afterwards!). However, getting the transaction confirmed can take many hours at the times of high demand and then it still fails because thanks to the volatility, the trans…
Eh? The volatility is a HUGE problem for bitcoin as a currency. If I run a small business, accepting payment in bitcoin just creates risk. The state of my business not only depends on the quality and success of my product/service but also on the volatility of bitcoin because by accepting bitcoin I am forced to effectively take a long position on BTC. The price could crash by 25% before I sell the bitcoin and now I've…
Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does one take a short position in Bitcoin?
If the futures markets at the CBOT or CME attract volume, you could use those. Otherwise, you'd have to do it over-the-counter. Borrow a bitcoin from someone and turn it into real money. When you have to repay, if BTC is down, you'll buy back a BTC at a profit. If it's up, you'll have to buy back at a loss. Note that this gives you a maximum gain of whatever BTC/USD is today (assuming you denominate in greenbacks), w…
Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
#307It's for the same reason that no one wanted to touch zimbabwe dollar back in 2007, if the value of the medium of exchange differs from breakfast to lunch it's not really a good medium of exchange. Doesn't matter if value is appreciating or depreciating, currency needs to have a reasonably stable value to be useful.
The volatility alone wouldn't be a huge problem if the transactions were quick, apart from having to constantly re-price the goods (not a big deal with an automated system selling digital downloads, even though it is a real PITA for the accounting afterwards!). However, getting the transaction confirmed can take many hours at the times of high demand and then it still fails because thanks to the volatility, the trans…
Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think this is what will ultimately bring Bitcoin down People have been saying that for years. It serves purposes other than buying and selling goods, and in fact almost no one uses it to buy things.
That’s an entirely different narrative about Bitcoin, though, then what was presented to us when it was seeking adoption. The messaging was literally: use this to buy things. Maybe we all got it wrong, but a lot of people did, then; we must never forget the infamous Bitcoin pizzas. https://twitter.com/bitcoin_pizza I’ve noticed this trend lately of rewriting what Bitcoin is for because I assure you, it was presented…
People who have been involved with Bitcoin from the beginning are not trying to change it's definition. It will 100% be digital cash in due time. The reason it's taking so "long" is because the dev team cares about keeping it decentralized and doesn't throw sloppy code out and end up forking it later like many other alt coins
Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think most reputable proponents have been saying that for years though. In any case, the internet was designed as a communication medium that could survive nuclear war. That's how it was sold by its proponents. So what.
> I don't think most reputable proponents have been saying that for years though. Define reputable. > Announcing the first release of Bitcoin, a new electronic cash system http://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org... > Instant transactions for points-of-sale http://web.archive.org/web/20130805223235/http://bitcoin.org... (That verbiage lasted most of 2013, but was removed a couple days after this c…
Ethereum, the supposed answer to bitcoins problem has just recently began to see the exact same problem. Why? Because of a dumb kitten game - what happens once even a single ICO finds an moderate amount of user base?
These are early times friend
Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What value? $13K of value, and counting.
All of which is speculative & counting on a future where BTC usage will be more prevalent. And how exactly will it become more prevalent when it can't be used for transactions.
Just like Gold, coloured beads, or stocks
> can't be used for transactions.
Gold is a pain to use for transactions, and so are shares, but they still store value and people continue to speculate on their future worth?