Live data from Hacker News

How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

bloomberg.com

31–38 of 38 posts

Re: How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

#31
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Humans are currently too inexpensive to make a harvesting robot worth the cost (sadly enough). Let's say you spend $10M on R&D (a very low number in my opinion), each robot costs $50k to build, and maintenance/repairs cost $5k/year. You decide to charge your first customer $100k because you have to cover some of your R&D, and you pass all the maintenance costs on to them. For that $105k per year, a farmer could hire…

More variables: picking only ripe fruit; handling the fruit more carefully; picking more rapidly so you can share the robot with many growers; refrigerating the fruit from the moment of picking. Any of these could make it worthwhile?

This is more an argument for an augmented human system than it is a slam dunk for something completely autonomous.

For example an unmanned, refrigerated, follow-me cart with a soft hopper could be a multiplier on picking productivity without all the hassles of actual mobile manipulation and perception.

Re: How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

#33
The technology is kind of cool.

Unfortunately, I absolutely loathe Driscoll's raspberries. I will buy anybody else's raspberries first, and I will simply not use raspberries if I have to buy Driscoll's.

They're big and red, but they're too firm and fleshy. They have very little juice, and, even if you get lucky and they're sweet, they don't have a robust raspberry flavor. I used to fight with the yellowjackets to pick raspberries in the Northeast US. I can't even imagine anything in nature wanting these raspberries.

I'm not terribly fond of their strawberries and blackberries either, but they're no different from the rest of the industry on those. Again, the fruits are too big, too fleshy, and not juicy enough. Consequently, they are far less flavorful.

This is standard across the industry. Water content == bruising and lost sales. So, anything with water content gets bred until the water goes away. Tomatoes, raspberries, strawberries, etc. have all gotten this treatment.

It's just like roses, we've bred them to last long when cut, but that breeds out the fact that it smells like a rose.

At some point, we have to accept that getting that last "9" of efficiency on a biological organism isn't actually worth it.

Re: How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

#34

I'd like natural strawberries, thank you very much!!! Edit: The downvoters are free to be subjects for future genetic engineering projects themselves.

>Edit: The downvoters are free to be subjects for future genetic engineering projects themselves.

Where do you think food came from in the first place?

Do you seriously think strawberries are in any way a product of a natural process?

Re: How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

#35
The caption on panel #3 of the "DNA shot" graphic made me burst a blood vessel.

Here's how I extract DNA with fun kitchen science.

  1. Freeze.
  2. Add dish detergent and NaCl.
  3. Puree in blender.
  4. Thaw.  Stir *very gently* from this point forward.
  5. Add meat tenderizer and/or contact lens solution.
  6. Filter the mess to get mostly clear fluid.
  7. Layer rubbing alcohol over the solution.
  (If you use ethanol, make sure it's high-proof.)
  8. Draw DNA and RNA up from aqueous layer through alcohol layer with a kebab skewer.

Re: How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

#36

Does anyone know how strawberries are harvested? I've been toying with the idea of a produce harvesting robotics startup. But I guess the first step is to talk to some farmers?

I realize that planting isn't the same thing as harvesting, but I once had an acquaintance who was a salesperson for an Australian startup that made automated planting machines. Imagine a robot about the size of a small refrigerator that creeps along the field on bulldozer treads, digging holes and dispensing seeds as it goes. To try and sell these things, my acquaintance would go out in the field and work alongside…

Often, having a superior product/method isn't enough. You also have to create a cultural change in the target market. If they don't wake up every morning thinking, "I wish someone would offer me [insert product/service here]", then it's very hard to sell it to them.

Re: How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

#37
post #16

Does anyone know how strawberries are harvested? I've been toying with the idea of a produce harvesting robotics startup. But I guess the first step is to talk to some farmers?

Humans are currently too inexpensive to make a harvesting robot worth the cost (sadly enough). Let's say you spend $10M on R&D (a very low number in my opinion), each robot costs $50k to build, and maintenance/repairs cost $5k/year. You decide to charge your first customer $100k because you have to cover some of your R&D, and you pass all the maintenance costs on to them. For that $105k per year, a farmer could hire…

On the other hand, in this reality: http://www.machines-simon.com/en/our-machines/vegetable-harv... http://www.tumoba.nl/en/products.php/vegetable-harvesters/le... http://automatedag.com/ http://www.oxbocorp.com/Products/ProcessedVegetables.aspx

Re: How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

#38

Driscoll strawberries are disgusting when compared to a more natural and naturally grown strawberry.

What kind is that, exactly? Since, you know, humans have been selecting and cultivating plants for specific characteristics since the beginning of agriculture. And that's all that this article is describing, saying "I like this characteristic, lets try breeding it with this other strain and see what comes about". I would be interested in these primitive, untouched by man strains you seem to be referencing, as such, a…

Have you ever eaten a strawberry.
Post reply on HN