No surprises there. I get deeply frustrated (though I understand where they are coming from) when governments make the argument that they can't take advantage of this or that cloud service because the service's security isn't vetted. Clearly, the security in the backing systems owned by the government isn't sufficiently vetted either, so they're sacrificing velocity for non-security. I know, it's a flippant attitude.…
The goverment has known how to vet their systems since well before 1989, when I attended a class taught by a security consultant for the DoD. For example, your aged grandfather used to run ethernet through pressurized conduit. If that pressure ever dropped some heavily armed men would turn up. The IP packet header has fields for security classification as well as compartment. If I design warheads and you design rocke…
Office of Personnel Management Says Hackers Got Data of Millions of Individuals
31–40 of 86 posts
Re: Office of Personnel Management Says Hackers Got Data of Millions of Individuals
#32https://www.clearancejobs.com/security_clearance_faq.pdf
"What will I be asked during a security clearance interview? During a ESI, the investigator will cover every item on your clearance application and have you confirm the accuracy and completeness of the information. You will be asked about a few matters that are not on your application, such as the handling of protected information, susceptibility to blackmail, and sexual misconduct. You will be asked to provide details regarding any potential security/suitability issues. During a SPIN, the investigator will only cover the security/suitability issue(s) that triggered the SPIN. The purpose of the SPIN is to afford the applicant the opportunity to refute or to confirm and provide details regarding the issue(s)."
More:
http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/2015/06/17/sf-86-sec...
"They got everyone's SF-86," one Pentagon official familiar with the investigation told Military Times.
"The SF-86, a 127-page document, asks government employees to disclose information about family members, friends and past employment as well as details on alcohol and drug use, mental illness, credit ratings, bankruptcies, arrest records and court actions."
..
http://news.clearancejobs.com/2015/06/13/sf-86-stolen-opm-ha...
"The entirety of at least some SF-85 and SF-86 background investigations held on OPM servers were breached, meaning sensitive data including relatives, spouses, and sensitive information on everything from mental health counseling to sexual behavior is now in the hands of the Chinese government."
And if you're really bored:
Re: Office of Personnel Management Says Hackers Got Data of Millions of Individuals
#33Re: Office of Personnel Management Says Hackers Got Data of Millions of Individuals
#34Before you start shitting on OPM and the like, is this any different than what would happen if a dedicated attacker came after the most valuable data in your company? Clearly, OPM should know, but omg is the state of security poor.
My company didn't compile detailed background information about my "sexual misconduct", or spend money trying to detail the ways in which I might be blackmailed.
So yeah, it's a little different.
Re: Office of Personnel Management Says Hackers Got Data of Millions of Individuals
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's quite a bit of u.s. government on amazon cloud. Using a cloud service doesn't magically give you better security. This is more an indication of the NSA focusing too strongly on offensive/monitoring operations and not on information security, which is their job as well.
Yes, there's a whole portion of the Amazon Cloud that's run entirely for government (a family member is a higher-up at AWS Gov), and I have to assume they're also running private clouds with physical security, but I have no idea.
Re: Office of Personnel Management Says Hackers Got Data of Millions of Individuals
#36And yet, tomorrow they'll have no qualms making the case that, of course, the government can securely keep backdoor keys to investigate encrypted communications.
Re: Office of Personnel Management Says Hackers Got Data of Millions of Individuals
#37And yet, tomorrow they'll have no qualms making the case that, of course, the government can securely keep backdoor keys to investigate encrypted communications.
Re: Office of Personnel Management Says Hackers Got Data of Millions of Individuals
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is more an indication of the NSA focusing too strongly on offensive/monitoring operations and not on information security, which is their job as well. This is precisely how I feel about this kind of thing. To my mind, the NSA should be working to make the security technologies used by American individuals, American companies, and the American government as strong and as free of vulnerabilities as possible. The…
> To my mind, the NSA should be working to make the security technologies used by American individuals, American companies, and the American government as strong and as free of vulnerabilities as possible. Didn't NSA develop SELinux? Edit: Heh, lets all avoid the fact that NSA created something insanely useful for the entire world. Nobody likes to think about these things. Hating is so much easier.
Re: Office of Personnel Management Says Hackers Got Data of Millions of Individuals
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's quite a bit of u.s. government on amazon cloud. Using a cloud service doesn't magically give you better security. This is more an indication of the NSA focusing too strongly on offensive/monitoring operations and not on information security, which is their job as well.
> information security, which is their job as well. Is that really their job? It seems there might be a dozen other agencies responsible, ones less interested in foreign computer networks. Is that DISA's bailiwick? Perhaps NIST? Homeland Security? et cetera
The agency that deals with intelligence (espionage) is the CIA, and the CIA do have their own cyber espionage systems, NSA not only is not doing their actual job, but they are being redundant.