Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone who's used to MySQL, I keep trying to use PostgreSQL (better standards compliance, better behaviour in the face of bad data) - and I keep going back. The psql interface is awkward (too many magic backslash commands to memorize instead of SHOW CREATE TABLE) and always feels slightly laggy somehow.
The backslash commands are way better than having to type out SHOW TABLES; or SHOW DATABASES;, or CONNECT DATABASE X. All I have to do is \dt or \c x. It's so much better. Can't remember them? Just do \?.
“Fashion Is Hard. PostgreSQL Is Easy” [video]
31–40 of 140 posts
Re: “Fashion Is Hard. PostgreSQL Is Easy” [video]
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone who's used to MySQL, I keep trying to use PostgreSQL (better standards compliance, better behaviour in the face of bad data) - and I keep going back. The psql interface is awkward (too many magic backslash commands to memorize instead of SHOW CREATE TABLE) and always feels slightly laggy somehow.
Admittedly, I haven't used the PG or MySQL cli in years. Coughed up money for a Navicat Premium license about 5 years ago and never looked back.
Re: “Fashion Is Hard. PostgreSQL Is Easy” [video]
#33Hmm, looking a bit at their site[1]: Addidas jogging pants -- 59,95 € Volcom T-shirt print -- 17,45 € Under Armour T-shirt -- 39.95 € Like really now -- who needs this stuff? Especially when you can just go to Aldi or Tchibo (or any of a number of other discount retailers readily visible at nearly every shopping mall in Germany) and buy essentially same stuff (minus the logos, of course) for 1/10th of the price. So p…
You always get what you pay for. I'd rather not buy too cheap and wear toxic stuff: http://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article133578674/Greenpeace-wa...
Or that the 10x factor in price overhead is in any substantive way directly invested in safer product standards. No matter how you slice it, to a large extent all we're really getting when we shop at specifically fashion-outlets (as their marketing gurus know all to well) is... the brand.
Re: “Fashion Is Hard. PostgreSQL Is Easy” [video]
#34PosgreSQL is pretty much my default. Any other database has to have compelling arguments for how it fits my use case if I'm going to use it over Postgres, and even then, it usually gets used for a subset of the data, while Postgres gets everything else. I think it's better to default to the tried-and-true piece of software than the new and shiny, rather than the other way around and have to argue why Postgres is a go…
That's probably the best way of looking at it. PostgreSQL is generally going to be the best solution for 90% of your data, short of having a subset that's write heavy to the point of streaming.
Re: “Fashion Is Hard. PostgreSQL Is Easy” [video]
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should also check out https://www.jetbrains.com/dbe/
I'm fairly sure I signed up for the early access program months ago and still haven't heard back. It's possible that I meant to and didn't though.
Re: “Fashion Is Hard. PostgreSQL Is Easy” [video]
#36Hmm, looking a bit at their site[1]: Addidas jogging pants -- 59,95 € Volcom T-shirt print -- 17,45 € Under Armour T-shirt -- 39.95 € Like really now -- who needs this stuff? Especially when you can just go to Aldi or Tchibo (or any of a number of other discount retailers readily visible at nearly every shopping mall in Germany) and buy essentially same stuff (minus the logos, of course) for 1/10th of the price. So p…
Big brands like Adidas or Under Armour don't have a clean track record either, but at least they are somewhat accountable to consumers because their #1 asset is their reputation. To fix global trade, it's better to do a bit of research into what kind of company you want to support, rather than blindly buying the cheapest imported thing "because they all suck anyway".
Re: “Fashion Is Hard. PostgreSQL Is Easy” [video]
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Coming up with ideas is easy. Executing them well is hard.
Zalando is hardly executed well. The work conditions in their logistics centers are (infamously) atrocious. The strategy was distinctly described by one of the Samwer brothers in email conversation as "Blitzkrieg" and "the most aggressive plan in history". Work climate (not only for manual labor) reflects this attitude pretty well.
When you look at it more closely, the Samwers have effectively managed to reallocate billions of dollars into startups all over the world in places where raising money, or working for a startup, was practically impossible. Remember the second largest location for venture capital funding, the UK, only receives about 1/20th as much as the Bay Area alone.
The more mature Rocket companies (btw Zalando isn't, strictly, a Rocket company - it had a distinct set of actual founders) are now pretty desirable employers in their respective countries, and deliver relatively good customer service, certainly better than many much bigger and more resourced companies, and usually crushing the non-existent, overwhelmed service you can expect in most emerging markets. Is the backend a little messy and "move fast and break things", sure, but I was surprised by how BAD most backends actually were in the business world period, and the codebases I had a look into were, by those standards, alright (for example: enforcing foreign keys! a luxury in the Era of Mongo and "logic is in the ORM"). What about the warehouses? Perhaps not quite Amazon, but definitely a huge step up from the average e-commerce startup. At least you know where your inventory is, you're not somehow missing 3%.
Yes, Berlin can be a bit abrasive on egos. I left in part because of that, or at least it tipped me over the edge of setting up my own thing after dealing with one too many fake-angry German (hi H!). But with a bit of time and distance I really appreciate what the Samwers tried to do, and there's definitely a lot of founders who got their "change in life" thanks to a few months/years in a Rocket company, making their mistakes at someone else's expense.
It's also quite impressive that Oli is still as hands on as he is, very numbers driven despite flying continuously around the world, spending less than a day in each business yet knowing their numbers better than their managers. I think the tone of the email, and his motivational speeches, is taken out of context; also, the "vision" is, when you strip the hyperbole away (in Australia: "I do not want to be before the wave, or after the wave, I want to surf the wave"), relatively accurate. By modern and especially American standards, he's quite a polite fellow if demanding.
Re: “Fashion Is Hard. PostgreSQL Is Easy” [video]
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Zalando is hardly executed well. The work conditions in their logistics centers are (infamously) atrocious. The strategy was distinctly described by one of the Samwer brothers in email conversation as "Blitzkrieg" and "the most aggressive plan in history". Work climate (not only for manual labor) reflects this attitude pretty well.
Yes, their website still sucks in the same ways it did 3 years ago. It boggles the mind. They have a huge selection, expensive advertising campaigns and lenient shipping & return policies, fueled by huge sums of money, so they have a huge market share. Its nice, but execution is merely decent imho.
Re: “Fashion Is Hard. PostgreSQL Is Easy” [video]
#39Which is probably a more unorthodox use of databases these days, at least for Postgres (I've heard it was more common for SQL Server and I once had the questionable joy of debugging a petri net solver in Oracle).
Re: “Fashion Is Hard. PostgreSQL Is Easy” [video]
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone who's used to MySQL, I keep trying to use PostgreSQL (better standards compliance, better behaviour in the face of bad data) - and I keep going back. The psql interface is awkward (too many magic backslash commands to memorize instead of SHOW CREATE TABLE) and always feels slightly laggy somehow.
The backslash commands are way better than having to type out SHOW TABLES; or SHOW DATABASES;, or CONNECT DATABASE X. All I have to do is \dt or \c x. It's so much better. Can't remember them? Just do \?.