Would this run faster on a Windows-SDD than on a Mac-mini sloooow HDD?
Install OS X 10.10 Yosemite in VirtualBox
31–40 of 109 posts
Re: Install OS X 10.10 Yosemite in VirtualBox
#32It seems the image must be created on an existing OS X installation. Is a pre-baked image portable to virtualbox running on other host OS:es? (Yes I know, Eula yada yada).
Re: Install OS X 10.10 Yosemite in VirtualBox
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. Those legally binding EULAs with the associated EULA-violations we've constantly heard people getting jailed over. How about you Mac-heads come to terms with Macs being bog standard X86 hardware and OSX being a bog standard X86 OS, and that running a bog standard X86 OS on bog standard X86 hardware is absolutely within everyone's legal right to do? There's nothing special about your hardware nor OS. Get over it.…
What is "proper" Linux?
I was referring to Linux as a proper, unrestricted Unix-environment.
Re: Install OS X 10.10 Yosemite in VirtualBox
#34It seems the image must be created on an existing OS X installation. Is a pre-baked image portable to virtualbox running on other host OS:es? (Yes I know, Eula yada yada).
I know of some images that are available at The Pirate Bay, but they are only for VMware and also require some kind of patch to the virtualisation software for a reason I do not know.
Virtual box support EFI-boot fine, so no patches are needed and OSX can be installed from a normal, unhacked ISO-file.
Basically I'd say this is a shortcoming in VMware and I'm surprised it's still there after all these years.
Re: Install OS X 10.10 Yosemite in VirtualBox
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is "proper" Linux?
In retrospect I'll have to say it's bad wording on my part. I was referring to Linux as a proper, unrestricted Unix-environment.
Ironic really, given that OS X is certified UNIX 03, and I don't believe any Linux distribution is.
Re: Install OS X 10.10 Yosemite in VirtualBox
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
In retrospect I'll have to say it's bad wording on my part. I was referring to Linux as a proper, unrestricted Unix-environment.
> I was referring to Linux as a proper, unrestricted Unix-environment Ironic really, given that OS X is certified UNIX 03, and I don't believe any Linux distribution is.
Being a properly free and unrestricted environment to work with and work in is not. That's something concrete, real and has actual value.
Re: Install OS X 10.10 Yosemite in VirtualBox
#37Would this run faster on a Windows-SDD than on a Mac-mini sloooow HDD?
Why don't you replace that Mac Mini HDD with a blazing fast SSD instead?
I'm sure the next iteration of the Mini will go to 32GB/64GB(+$100)/128GB(+$300) M.2 SSD options, all conveniently soldered onto the mainboard as well.
Re: Install OS X 10.10 Yosemite in VirtualBox
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know of some images that are available at The Pirate Bay, but they are only for VMware and also require some kind of patch to the virtualisation software for a reason I do not know.
VMware does not (last time I checked) support (U)EFI boot and OSX relies on this, even though it's an extremely dated EFI version from 2006. Virtual box support EFI-boot fine, so no patches are needed and OSX can be installed from a normal, unhacked ISO-file. Basically I'd say this is a shortcoming in VMware and I'm surprised it's still there after all these years.
Re: Install OS X 10.10 Yosemite in VirtualBox
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
in other countries, the US can activate and kill with drones, their laws have little to legal meaning at all.
Sure, I live in the UK and I live in constant fear of the mighty US drone army. Our laws (a great deal of which predate the existence of the US) have no meaning.
Re: Install OS X 10.10 Yosemite in VirtualBox
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's not, you're allowed to install OS X in virtual machines granted it is on a apple device. I was with you until you said something about restrictions. No court of law anywhere has said that you running standard X86 code in a standard X86 environment is illegal.
Somehow I imagine you take a rather different stance when it comes to the many aspects of the GPL or AGPL that haven't been tested in court. On those issues the position of the FSF is very much 'illegal till proven otherwise' (that's if you actually succeed in getting Eben Moglen to give a straight answer).
Effectively this is testimony to how well the GPL has been put together from a legal point of view, it is bad contracts, agreements and licenses that are tested in court.