Interesting to see Stranger in a Strange Land on his list. It shows up quite often on top lists of sci-fi books and Heinlein books. I'm halfway through it, after reading The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, and Stranger in a Strange Land is certainly the weaker book so far in my opinion.
Prof. Sussman's Reading List
31–40 of 78 posts
Re: Prof. Sussman's Reading List
#32Interesting to see Stranger in a Strange Land on his list. It shows up quite often on top lists of sci-fi books and Heinlein books. I'm halfway through it, after reading The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, and Stranger in a Strange Land is certainly the weaker book so far in my opinion.
I read Time Enough for Love every few years. Each time I can't wait for enough years to go by until I've forgotten enough to read it again.
Re: Prof. Sussman's Reading List
#33Interesting to see Stranger in a Strange Land on his list. It shows up quite often on top lists of sci-fi books and Heinlein books. I'm halfway through it, after reading The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, and Stranger in a Strange Land is certainly the weaker book so far in my opinion.
I've read Stranger once. It was OK (to me). I read Time Enough for Love every few years. Each time I can't wait for enough years to go by until I've forgotten enough to read it again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Enough_for_Love
Re: Prof. Sussman's Reading List
#34Interesting to see Stranger in a Strange Land on his list. It shows up quite often on top lists of sci-fi books and Heinlein books. I'm halfway through it, after reading The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, and Stranger in a Strange Land is certainly the weaker book so far in my opinion.
As I struggle to wade through it, I wonder why it was ever as popular as it once was. What is it about this book that make so many people recommend it?
Re: Prof. Sussman's Reading List
#35Re: Prof. Sussman's Reading List
#36Quantum Computing since Democritus in high school reading list is very heavy. I have had Theory of Computation class in college and I can't read 20 pages of that book.
On the other hand, if you treat each page, each statement as something you have to completely internalize before moving onto the next page—including looking up all the prerequisite topics recursively on Wikipedia or in other texts—you might just end up teaching yourself up to college-level math while still in high school. (I didn't do this myself with QCD, but I very nearly did it with SICP in middle school.)
Re: Prof. Sussman's Reading List
#37Quantum Computing since Democritus in high school reading list is very heavy. I have had Theory of Computation class in college and I can't read 20 pages of that book.
On the other hand, if you treat each page, each statement as something you have to completely internalize before moving onto the next page—including looking up all the prerequisite topics recursively on Wikipedia or in other texts—you might just end up teaching yourself up to college-level math while still in high school. (I didn't do this myself with QCD, but I very nearly did it with SICP in middle school.)
Re: Prof. Sussman's Reading List
#38Robert McIntyre is a wizard in his own right. He has taken the prowess of his mental faculties to the extreme, even mastering the art of bioluminescence.
Re: Prof. Sussman's Reading List
#39I cannot recommend 'The Society of Mind' enough. This was my first book before diving into Cognitive Science. Although it is mostly psychology(i.e.speculation), it is a brilliant book with insights and ideas.
I'm confused, you recommend it? Or you don't
Re: Prof. Sussman's Reading List
#40I cannot recommend 'The Society of Mind' enough. This was my first book before diving into Cognitive Science. Although it is mostly psychology(i.e.speculation), it is a brilliant book with insights and ideas.
Why do find psychology to be speculation? Do they not use empiricism in their studies (maybe not all of them)?