31–40 of 102 posts
Anyone else already find the XSS in genius.it? Edit: wow, the whole thing is seriously broken. Emailing them now. Edit 2: It's not as broken as I thought, and these guys are quick to reply and try to figure things out. To be clear, I haven't gotten it to run arbitrary JS, just include arbitrary HTML, which isn't as dangerous.
Let us know this'd be very helpful! tom@genius.com
I would actually like this in an IDE. Visual Studio kind of does this with header comments but it would be great to be able to show/hide comments with links, rich text,...
Vim's folding doesn't do this out-of-the-box, but you can set it up to do so. Clickable links aren't doable, though copying and opening in a browser tab is something like seven keystrokes on my current setup.
Amazing that it has been more than nine years since the original release (Jan 14, 2006)! How long did it take for John to write this initial version? Any idea?
http://genius.it/https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=933629...
Very neat content, but does it have to be formatted like this? I respect that it preserves the original file, but it makes it very difficult to read. Comments added to the source code would serve much better for the purposes of understanding the code. This tool makes it impossible to read the annotation and the source code at the same time. Clicking on 'set' for example, about 20-30 lines in, lets you read the annota…
This looks like an ad for Genius, though, so that'd be why.
Though Resig's anecdotes are fun and interesting to read, it doesn't help that much with understanding the actual source code. Here's a better version in terms of readability and depth: https://robflaherty.github.io/jquery-annotated-source/ https://robflaherty.github.io/jquery-annotated-source/docs/0... Sadly, no longer updated since jQuery 1.6.2 which was released in 2011.
Very neat content, but does it have to be formatted like this? I respect that it preserves the original file, but it makes it very difficult to read. Comments added to the source code would serve much better for the purposes of understanding the code. This tool makes it impossible to read the annotation and the source code at the same time. Clicking on 'set' for example, about 20-30 lines in, lets you read the annota…
Very neat content, but does it have to be formatted like this? I respect that it preserves the original file, but it makes it very difficult to read. Comments added to the source code would serve much better for the purposes of understanding the code. This tool makes it impossible to read the annotation and the source code at the same time. Clicking on 'set' for example, about 20-30 lines in, lets you read the annota…
This formatting style for annotated sources always seems to work so well: http://robflaherty.github.io/jquery-annotated-source/docs/01...
- Pycco[1] Python
- Rocco[2] Ruby
- Shocco[3] POSIX Shell
- Many more, as found here[4]
Note each of these projects support highlighting different languages. For example, the Pycco[1] project uses the Pygments library for language handling, and thus supports many different languages. Others, like Shocco[3] only support one language (Shell in the case of Shocco).
[0] - http://jashkenas.github.io/docco/
[1] - https://github.com/fitzgen/pycco
[2] - http://rtomayko.github.io/rocco/rocco.html
Amazing that it has been more than nine years since the original release (Jan 14, 2006)! How long did it take for John to write this initial version? Any idea?
I don't have exact records but based upon what I was inspired by, and what else I was working on at the time, it roughly equates to the fall of 2005. I was in college at the time and taking classes so I was working on it on-and-off as my schedule allowed. I finished it up over winter break and went with some friends to BarCamp NYC 2006 and released it there.
Very neat content, but does it have to be formatted like this? I respect that it preserves the original file, but it makes it very difficult to read. Comments added to the source code would serve much better for the purposes of understanding the code. This tool makes it impossible to read the annotation and the source code at the same time. Clicking on 'set' for example, about 20-30 lines in, lets you read the annota…
This formatting style for annotated sources always seems to work so well: http://robflaherty.github.io/jquery-annotated-source/docs/01...
Is this intentionally divergent or is it some kind of bug?