Live data from Hacker News

5G researchers manage record connection speed

bbc.co.uk

31–34 of 34 posts

Re: 5G researchers manage record connection speed

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're entirely optimistic, I fear: "One of the new AT&T plans will cost $25 per month and offer two gigabytes of data per month, which AT&T says will be enough for 98 percent of its smart phone customers. Additional gigabytes will cost $10 each." This is in 2010. Today that $25 will actually get you HALF the data it did in 2010, five years ago.

This is why I buy phones outright to keep my unlimited data plan from verizon. I tether it for my home internet as well, usually use between 80-100gb/month. I'm waiting for the day they just take it away.

[deleted]

Re: 5G researchers manage record connection speed

#32
post #2

"We need to bring end-to-end latency down to below one millisecond" The incredible bandwidth is surely great but they don't mention how to improve latency here, they forget to tell what was the latency of this 100m transfer from an antenna to a receiver. One of the big issues with today apps is latency, this is easily frustrating. It also prevents apps such as real time multiplayer games to be viable.

Any omnidirectional microwave/RF network technology will have a short enough range that the signal propagation time is negligible for the purposes of human-perceived latency. This is a consequence of the need for cells to be small enough that they are only serving a manageable number of users. (Directional links like microwave backbones and backhaul can have latency worth caring about.)

Any latency you perceive comes from your packets sitting in a buffer waiting for their turn to be transmitted or waiting to be re-transmitted after a collision. The problem of queue management for wired networks has only had a satisfactory solution for a few years. When you throw in things like collisions due to the shared medium and interference from other users of the spectrum (less of a problem for cellular than WiFi), transmission rate and power selection covering multiple orders of magnitude, interference that can be problematic for some users but undetectable for users elsewhere in the cell, and the almost complete unwillingness of the hardware vendors to sell anything hackable enough to do research with, it's clear that wireless will continue to suck for the foreseeable future. However, a lot of these problems get a lot easier when you're working at a frequency that can never reach from the inside of your house to the inside of the neighbor's house.

Re: 5G researchers manage record connection speed

#33
post #8
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

San Francisco, both AT&T and Verizon. It's terrible here.

With T-Mobile LTE in San Francisco, I get 20Mbps+ in a lot of locations, including about half my residence. (Unfortunately there are also a bunch of very-weak spots with low bandwidth and multi-second pings, and far more dead zones along highways in rural areas.)

Rural and T-Mobile just don't get along right now. A year ago, the entire I-5 corridor as I approached Oregon and through crater lake was invisible for data or calls (with a small band of

I am, however, hopeful that T-Mobile has this in their sights [1]. They have done more to improve mobile user experience in the past 2 years than the rest of the networks for the past 10.

Post reply on HN