Earlier quoted context omitted.
From what I've read ordinary passenger vehicles put just about no strain on modern roads. Only heavy vehicles like semis do. Tax is tax, money is fungible.
Even if this is true, the business owners' argument to Congress would be that the consumer will pay for it either way; businesses that depend on transportation would just raise prices to compensate.
Why should I be taxed to fix road damage based on a metric that doesn't begin to accurately reflect my actual contribution to the problem?
Additionally, if the trucking industry had to raise rates due to a higher 'road maintenance tax' this may also make more efficient forms of transportation more popular, ie trains.