Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a thought experiment, not a critique of all scientists. I can definitely see elements of that straw man in some scientists that I have met.
Okay, but what is the point of the thought experiment? If the point is, as the addendum at the bottom indicates, to convince scientists to support a bioinformatics group rather than having their own bioinformatician, the same arguments and reasoning the post shows could've been presented without the whole "you're not allowed bioinformatics" framing device, which is certainly attention-getting but far less likely to b…
“You’re not allowed bioinformatics anymore”
31–33 of 33 posts
Read the essay that inspired this essay (linked), published by some little British journal, (Nature, I think?). The point is to express a similar frustration.
Re: “You’re not allowed bioinformatics anymore”
#32The end of the post: "If you are leading a project that creates huge amounts of data, instead of employing a bioinformatician in your own group, why not collaborate with an existing bioinformatics group and fund a post there?" If that's your goal, perhaps using a less derisive and incendiary tone towards the straw man scientist in the post would've been good?
As someone who's worked with micro biologists I can assure you it's not a straw man.
As someone who has worked with microbiologists, maybe you could start by spelling microbiologist right.