Live data from Hacker News

AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion

dealbook.nytimes.com

31–40 of 173 posts

Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion

#31

Do many young people watch TV anymore? It seems like netflix + youtube scratches that itch.

Sports. ESPN + NFL Redzone + TNT + Local channels in HD have no good alternative on the internet. If they did I wouldn't pay for TV.

Yes! Cable = Sports. If they somehow decouple those two then I'm all Internet.

Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion

#32
post #6

Use this as a perfect example to explain to people why Net Neutrality matters. "What incentive does AT&T have to bring you good streaming experience for Netflix, Hulu, or heck even Youtube when they'd much much MUCH rather you were buying DirecTV from them?"

Because I'll switch to Comcast or Verizon if I'm an ATT customer and their internet service is bad?

Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion

#34
post #19

Think. How would the content providers - any of them, from Disney to Facebook - get their content at the consumer without the data-distributors, from Comcast to AT&T ? The saying is internet kills the middleman, but this is the real middleman that needs to be killed, and just as our roads are free and open to everyone, so should the digital roads be.

Roads aren't free, we pay for them in taxes and tolls.

Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion

#35
post #6

Use this as a perfect example to explain to people why Net Neutrality matters. "What incentive does AT&T have to bring you good streaming experience for Netflix, Hulu, or heck even Youtube when they'd much much MUCH rather you were buying DirecTV from them?"

Because I'll switch to Comcast or Verizon if I'm an ATT customer and their internet service is bad?

I mean, I don't have an option to switch away from Comcast because their internet service is bad.

That's why they can refuse to upgrade their peering with Netflix in the first place, because they know I'm stuck with them, when I'd dump pretty much any ISP who didn't upgrade their peering with a major website that I visit (in like 3-4 months) if I had the option to.

Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sports. ESPN + NFL Redzone + TNT + Local channels in HD have no good alternative on the internet. If they did I wouldn't pay for TV.

Yes! Cable = Sports. If they somehow decouple those two then I'm all Internet.

Do you get ESPN3 through your ISP? It covers most sports both live and recorded, and doesn't require a cable subscription.

Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion

#37
post #21

Put that WhatsApp acquisition in your pipe and smoke it, Zuckerberg.

This acquisition is actually pretty easy to make sense of, unlike WhatsApp acquisition of Facebook. This is a company which made USD 31.7 Billion in revenues last year[0].

[0]: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1465112/0001047469140...

Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion

#40
post #19

Think. How would the content providers - any of them, from Disney to Facebook - get their content at the consumer without the data-distributors, from Comcast to AT&T ? The saying is internet kills the middleman, but this is the real middleman that needs to be killed, and just as our roads are free and open to everyone, so should the digital roads be.

Roads aren't free, we pay for them in taxes and tolls.

When people say "free and open", that's context enough to know that they mean free as in freedom, not as in beer. Please stop using this silly red herring.
Post reply on HN