The Return of Upcoming.org by Andy Baio
31–40 of 53 posts
Re: The Return of Upcoming.org by Andy Baio
#32It feels good to have a beloved service (potentially) returning, but I believe there's another opportunity here that's being missed. I don't know if it's been tried before, but there's a way to organize a service like this, one that relies completely on user-generated content, that would likely be much more resilient: a cooperative. Forgive me if this is half-baked. I'm not an expert by any means. Add a pledge level…
Personally, the experience of watching Upcoming wither and die is what got me first interested in alternative ways to pay for social networks and other community service websites. Co-operatives are one possible model.
Re: The Return of Upcoming.org by Andy Baio
#33What does Upcoming.org do better than Facebook, Google+, and Meetup.com?
Upcoming created the model for an events site tied to a social network, and since it was first, you could find almost any kind of event from a personal party to a stadium rock concert there.
Upcoming had very broad capabilities for tagging, geotagging, searching, following, and being notified about public events. It really shone for aficionados of particular music scenes in geographic areas, and for people who liked going to tech conferences. And knowing the events your friends are going to - or even thinking about going to - also helped catalyze attendance.
Lots of other products found niches that had special needs (for instance, Lanyrd or EventBrite), and Facebook completely owns casual events like barbecues and stuff. But nobody's done an events site that had quite the same mix of community and capability. Most of the sites who wanted to grab the Upcoming-esque market were focused on monetizing through profiling users, and then selling ads, or special offers for tickets. Seems like it should work, but it doesn't seem to have panned out. (Also, I know this may shock people, but Ticketmaster is really difficult to work with.)
However, it's not the tech capabilities that people really miss, it's the community. And probably most people are betting on Andy Baio. He is a well-trusted person who is a passionate fan of independent art and culture, and has a history of creating wonderful communities - like Upcoming, KickStarter, and XOXO.
Re: The Return of Upcoming.org by Andy Baio
#34Reminds me of when I worked at Yahoo, and in 2009 I had to track down someone who worked on Upcoming. I found someone who had Upcoming listed in their Backyard profile, but "Oh, I don't work on that anymore. Last I heard {other person} was working on it." So I tracked down that person, only to hear the same response. Following the chain, four or five people and half a day later I finally found the one person in the e…
Why the hell did they bother acquiring it, then? I don't get it.
Re: The Return of Upcoming.org by Andy Baio
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
You may think it is unnecessary, but I don't see how it is dishonest or immoral. Those are very strong words not supported by any argument.
Nobody asked for an argument, and by downvoting any argument on my part was prevented. I can explain why I find it immoral: I think the world has many real and deep problems, and investing in a web application that is not hard to build and solves a superfluous first world problem, is a waste of resources. Conversely, I think profiting from it is dishonest and immoral. You may disagree with my reasoning and you may ha…
> Nobody asked for an argument, and by downvoting any
> argument on my part was prevented.
I feel like we're all being trolled, but how is your failure to present a cogent argument in your initial comment affected by downvotes that occur at a later time? You did the online equivalent to walking up to someone and saying to their face that they are dishonest and immoral, without any rationale for such an offensive position. In real life, you'd be punched in the face or, at the very least, escorted off their property. Is the fact that you're being downvoted really that surprising to you?What you write is being held to a higher standard than what you are accustomed to. You can choose to use this as an opportunity to grow and improve your writing and better present your thoughts or you can choose to complain at how unfair it is. In your Redis comment[0] you talk about having manners and respect for other people's work. Perhaps you can hold yourself to this same standard.
Re: The Return of Upcoming.org by Andy Baio
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
For starters, it's not Facebook or Google+. Many people are looking for ways to be less dependent on FB and Google+. If the Upcoming folk shape this the right way, both in product design and pitch, they will capture people who are tired of creepily pervasive social networks but still want to set up events easily.
Who are these magical unicorns? Because it's starting to feel like outrage porn to point out how people just don't want to invite themselves to a Facebook event.
So I am definitely looking forward to Upcoming's return.
Re: The Return of Upcoming.org by Andy Baio
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
You may think it is unnecessary, but I don't see how it is dishonest or immoral. Those are very strong words not supported by any argument.
Nobody asked for an argument, and by downvoting any argument on my part was prevented. I can explain why I find it immoral: I think the world has many real and deep problems, and investing in a web application that is not hard to build and solves a superfluous first world problem, is a waste of resources. Conversely, I think profiting from it is dishonest and immoral. You may disagree with my reasoning and you may ha…
You haven't presented any reasoning to disagree with, even when it was specifically asked for.
Re: The Return of Upcoming.org by Andy Baio
#38Re: The Return of Upcoming.org by Andy Baio
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who are these magical unicorns? Because it's starting to feel like outrage porn to point out how people just don't want to invite themselves to a Facebook event.
Since you use the phrase "magical unicorns" -- I know 10-15 people (and not just 'tech' people; they work in different fields like art, writing, etc.) who refuse to use Facebook because it erodes privacy and atrophies your brain (which I personally think is a very sensible position, even though I use Facebook). Every time there is some event, other people chide them for not having a Facebook, "Oh, you are too snobbis…
There are events your friends want you to show up. Whether that message is sent via Facebook, email, text, paper, or face to face is irrelevant. If you are wanted there, you will be there.
There are events you want friends of friends to show up. Facebook facilities this quite well, and if you don't have a Facebook account to do so but they still want you there, well, you'll likely be there.
Then there are events you want strangers to show up. Facebook serves this quite well. If the events require a ticket, Eventbrite's got that covered. If it's a business event then your Gcal or Outlook has it covered.
In this landscape, where does upcoming.org, where does an anti-Facebook solution stand? And is it enough to cover payroll?
Because snobbishness aside--I don't own a TV because TV atrophies your brain when I can create art because I'm artist--this... really isn't a problem anymore.
Re: The Return of Upcoming.org by Andy Baio
#40What did Yahoo! originally pay for Upcoming? I'd guess it was significant. The reason I ask is why the Kickstarter campaign?