What about all the distributions that don't include GNU, or those that only include a tiny proportion of GNU code, is there a chart that includes those?
They don't actually exist - it's just hot air from the anti-GNU crowd.
GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
31–40 of 59 posts
Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
#32This is beautiful. I'd like posters for my walls. Does anyone else know of similar diagrams suitable for printing?
SVG to PDF in google?
Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
#33What about all the distributions that don't include GNU, or those that only include a tiny proportion of GNU code, is there a chart that includes those?
Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
#34I maintain a specific timeline for Debian if anyone is interested: http://timeline.debian.net
Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
#35Such a waste of time and manpower creating all these forks. I wish folks spent time scratching their itch by writing great software for Linux instead of trying to reinvent the same wheel. And yet folks will continue to fork platform trying to solve problem that doesn't exist.
Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
#36What about all the distributions that don't include GNU, or those that only include a tiny proportion of GNU code, is there a chart that includes those?
They don't actually exist - it's just hot air from the anti-GNU crowd.
Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
#37Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
#38Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
You already see some kind of popularity – just count the number of forks.
Forks are also an indicator that people weren't happy with the origin.
That's like saying countries that based their "constitutions" off of another countries did it because they don't like that countries constitution. What's more likely is that they really like it but just wanted to tweak something.
Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline
#40I often find the need to create such a diagram.
I am hoping the answer is not Photoshop.