Live data from Hacker News

Google Will Eat Itself

googlewilleatitself.com

31–40 of 139 posts

Re: Google Will Eat Itself

#31
The point many of you are probably missing here is that this is not a proof of concept but a work of net/digital art, exhibited many times in the past (even at transmediale 2008) but fixed in a defined moment in time (~2006).

I've been a student of one of the authors (Alessandro Ludovico) in 2008, at the Academy of Fine Arts of Carrara (Italy).

Re: Google Will Eat Itself

#33

This is actually a pretty genius idea, but as pointed out by others this site looks old (evident by the design and inaccurate stock price). I also think the way Google shares work is that you can never truly own a meaningful share of Google via public shares.

It is really old, I think the first time that I saw it was in mid 2001

I doubt it, Google went public in 2004.

Re: Google Will Eat Itself

#34
post #30
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

which is incredible easy to do and very hard to prosecute... so guess what is the life blood of the industry

If it is so easy why there aren't still millions of people doing it? Why there are still robbers on the streets?

Plenty of people are doing click fraud. It takes some effort, its not just push button receive ill gotten gains, but it works. It is just not nearly as lucrative as other methods of driving illegitimate traffic nowadays, because most people dont do pay per click.

I dont have a spam website to push, but I know people who were making anywhere from 1-3k a month based on exploiting different advertising rings looking for traffic. Usually they would setup a campaign with an advertiser and wash dirty traffic that they were buying through the advertiser's site, paying 1/10-1/20th of the cost of each conversion or click, and most of the time those would just be botnet operations anyway, they didn't care.

It usually doesnt last long per identity, but those are a dime a dozen.

Re: Google Will Eat Itself

#36

This is actually a pretty genius idea, but as pointed out by others this site looks old (evident by the design and inaccurate stock price). I also think the way Google shares work is that you can never truly own a meaningful share of Google via public shares.

No it isn't. It sounds like it was created by someone with down syndrome.

Re: Google Will Eat Itself

#37
This reminds me of stock buy-back programs.

The company, using company revenues, to buy the company.

Although now I understand them, when I first heard of them I immediately thought it would lead to a stack overflow...

Re: Google Will Eat Itself

#38
post #4

I thought the share class structuring of Google was such that you can never own Google by buying its publicly traded shares?

You're right.. Class A is traded publicly. Class B is what's owned by Sergey and Brin, and it has 10 votes per share (vs 1 vote per share for Class A), and allows them to outvote all Class A shares.

Re: Google Will Eat Itself

#39
post #4

I thought the share class structuring of Google was such that you can never own Google by buying its publicly traded shares?

You're right.. Class A is traded publicly. Class B is what's owned by Sergey and Brin, and it has 10 votes per share (vs 1 vote per share for Class A), and allows them to outvote all Class A shares.

Sergey and Brin or Larry and Page? ;)

Re: Google Will Eat Itself

#40

The point many of you are probably missing here is that this is not a proof of concept but a work of net/digital art, exhibited many times in the past (even at transmediale 2008) but fixed in a defined moment in time (~2006). I've been a student of one of the authors (Alessandro Ludovico) in 2008, at the Academy of Fine Arts of Carrara (Italy).

For all of those who speak German, there's an old episode of CRE [1] in which Tim talks to Hans Bernhard and lizvlx from Austria. They were involved with the project and elaborate a bit about its motivations.

[1] http://cre.fm/cre132-ubermorgen-com

Post reply on HN