Live data from Hacker News

Lies, Maths, And Health Insurance

tauntermedia.com

31–32 of 32 posts

Re: Lies, Maths, And Health Insurance

#31
The article assumes that any cancellations must be unjust, and then uses math to show that there are more cancellations than one might suspect. But if the cancellations aren't unjust in the first place, then the article is all smoke and no fire.

News flash - If you include fraudulent information on your insurance application, your insurance company may cancel your coverage when you need it most. Of course, if you filled out your application in good faith and they try to cancel it for frivolous reasons, you can sue them in court.

What exactly is the problem here?

Most of the urgency in his article comes from comparing fraudulent insurance applications to game show contestants and underage gamblers. Using these kinds of analogies obscures the more fundamental fact that insurance companies can only legally cancel your policy when you have supplied demonstrably fraudulent information.

That hardly seems like a scandal, or anything that warrants additional government regulation in what is already an incredibly heavily regulated industry.

Re: Lies, Maths, And Health Insurance

#32
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Government run implies inefficiency and waste Not always. In fact, existing government-run healthcare systems are much more efficient than the present US system.

If by "much more efficient", you mean "lethally long waiting times for treatment, limited choice and no means to estimate competency of treatment providers", then you are correct.

No, I mean much cheaper with better objective health outcomes. Or are you seriously suggesting that the current US system works better than (for example) the current UK system?
Post reply on HN