Live data from Hacker News

SR-72

lockheedmartin.com

31–40 of 60 posts

Re: SR-72

#31

I am genuinely curious. Didn't satellites and drones make this obsolete as a concept?

No reason this couldn't be a drone, and no reason it'd necessarily be a recon craft - being able to hit a target anywhere with weapons with only a couple of hours notice would make acting on intel easier.

Re: SR-72

#33
post #6

I'm not that familiar with military aircraft development timelines, but this stuck out as my favorite part: A hypersonic plane does not have to be an expensive, distant possibility. In fact, an SR-72 could be operational by 2030.

By comparison, the SR-71 was first proposed around 1960 and operational by 1966. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SR-71_Blackbird

Progress!

Re: SR-72

#34
post #20

What's the deal with all the SR-71 posts in the past few days? They're a cool relic of the cold war age but what has happened recently with them that's warranted all the attention? Also if you're really enamored with them you should definitely check out the national airforce museum in Dayton, OH: http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/ You can see one up close, along with all kinds of other planes, jets, and missiles. Admi…

I'm amazed there are so many people interested in military equipment. Is this a USA thing? Would love someone to explain the appeal.

Re: SR-72

#35
post #10

The SR-71 was developed using 20th century technology. It was envisioned with slide rules and paper. It wasn’t managed by millions of lines of software code. And it wasn’t powered by computer chips. All that changes with the SR-72. Oh oh.

When I read that I was not so sure what the person who wrote that actually wanted to say. Cause it sounds a bit like: The SR-71 was built with solid engineering and hard work, this on the other hand is a pice of shit.

You only think that because you're(I assume) a programmer, which is how most programmers feel about their code.

Re: SR-72

#36

I am genuinely curious. Didn't satellites and drones make this obsolete as a concept?

It is a drone: "Envisioned as an unmanned aircraft, the SR-72 would fly at speeds up to Mach 6 ..."

Re: SR-72

#37
post #34
post #20

What's the deal with all the SR-71 posts in the past few days? They're a cool relic of the cold war age but what has happened recently with them that's warranted all the attention? Also if you're really enamored with them you should definitely check out the national airforce museum in Dayton, OH: http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/ You can see one up close, along with all kinds of other planes, jets, and missiles. Admi…

I'm amazed there are so many people interested in military equipment. Is this a USA thing? Would love someone to explain the appeal.

I wouldn't call the fastest airplane ever built to be just "military equipment". It's probably one of the greatest engineering achievements ever and it's still unsurpassed.

It's also a beautiful machine.

Re: SR-72

#38
post #34
post #20

What's the deal with all the SR-71 posts in the past few days? They're a cool relic of the cold war age but what has happened recently with them that's warranted all the attention? Also if you're really enamored with them you should definitely check out the national airforce museum in Dayton, OH: http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/ You can see one up close, along with all kinds of other planes, jets, and missiles. Admi…

I'm amazed there are so many people interested in military equipment. Is this a USA thing? Would love someone to explain the appeal.

I think the SR-71 interests most people despite being military equipment. It interests me in the same way that the X-15, Apollo, or SpaceX's Grasshopper interest me.

Re: SR-72

#39
post #34
post #20

What's the deal with all the SR-71 posts in the past few days? They're a cool relic of the cold war age but what has happened recently with them that's warranted all the attention? Also if you're really enamored with them you should definitely check out the national airforce museum in Dayton, OH: http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/ You can see one up close, along with all kinds of other planes, jets, and missiles. Admi…

I'm amazed there are so many people interested in military equipment. Is this a USA thing? Would love someone to explain the appeal.

It's not so much that it's military equipment. Some of it is just amazing engineering, regardless of context. Since many HNers are engineers, it is not surprising that posts about interesting/amazing feats of engineering get voted up.

One of my favourites (ignore the patriotic stuff in the beginning): http://www.wvi.com/~sr71webmaster/press_suit001.html

Re: SR-72

#40
'MURICA! Let's make a metal projectile move realy fucking fast through the air!! So fucking amazing angineering shit stuff thing! Fuck yeah!!
Post reply on HN