Live data from Hacker News

Tesla's 'Dangerously Ambitious' Gigafactory Could Save U.S. Battery Business

forbes.com

31–35 of 35 posts

Re: Tesla's 'Dangerously Ambitious' Gigafactory Could Save U.S. Battery Business

#31
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a founder of an energy storage company, Lightsail Energy. To say all government funded energy storage companies went belly up is an exaggeration. Many still survive, although you will note a strange anti-correlation between government funding and survival. In my opinion a lot of money did go in the wrong hands. The main problem is that the government is totally confused as to its actual funding strategy -- you ne…

Hi, I've been following your company. You lot are amazing. That is all. :) edit - oh, I do have one thing to ask, how do you think your tech compares with Gravitypower http://www.gravitypower.net/ and Isentropic http://www.isentropic.co.uk/ ? edit 2 - and when can I expect to be able to buy a small one, say enough storage for my house? Or are you only doing the grid-scale?

Speaking as a engineer who generally applauds the competitive attempts but is sometimes freaked out by the technical challenges they put ahead of themselves...

Gravity Power: I hope they have a good idea for how they can make and seal a giant concrete piston and boreshaft. I think engineered pumped hydro has a major edge on these guys -- and energy cache.

Isentropic: potentially lower cost than us (gravel's not too expensive), but significantly more loss channels, so a tougher efficiency problem. Serious loss channel potential in the thermal gradient, plus both heat stores need to be pressurized in their main design.

Wouldn't trade places with them, but maybe they'd say the same.

We might eventually do a ~10kw version for homes or a ~100kw version for cars but that is very speculative / in the future.

I am modestly excited by Ambri, Aquion, and Tesla.

Re: Tesla's 'Dangerously Ambitious' Gigafactory Could Save U.S. Battery Business

#32
post #4

Interesting fact presented in the beginning of the article: all the government funded research/companies went belly up. Food for thought: Is it because of the sheer difficulty of such ventures? Or is it because the money went to the wrong hands?

I'm a founder of an energy storage company, Lightsail Energy. To say all government funded energy storage companies went belly up is an exaggeration. Many still survive, although you will note a strange anti-correlation between government funding and survival. In my opinion a lot of money did go in the wrong hands. The main problem is that the government is totally confused as to its actual funding strategy -- you ne…

As a user of an off grid solar system I would like to replace my lead batteries with your compressed air solution, even with efficiency of less than 70% it will work for my needs, because with larger capacity I will be able to collect a lot of energy during summer and use it during cloudy winter.

Also I think you should consider doing a MVP (minimal viable product) with less efficiency but fully functional (as I understood from your blog you're struggling now with improving efficiency) and test it in real life, I think there are a lot of off the grid users in US who would like to test it, because real usage is very different than testing it in lab. You'll be able to test a lot of hardware components and be prepared for larger adoption.

Re: Tesla's 'Dangerously Ambitious' Gigafactory Could Save U.S. Battery Business

#33
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a founder of an energy storage company, Lightsail Energy. To say all government funded energy storage companies went belly up is an exaggeration. Many still survive, although you will note a strange anti-correlation between government funding and survival. In my opinion a lot of money did go in the wrong hands. The main problem is that the government is totally confused as to its actual funding strategy -- you ne…

As a user of an off grid solar system I would like to replace my lead batteries with your compressed air solution, even with efficiency of less than 70% it will work for my needs, because with larger capacity I will be able to collect a lot of energy during summer and use it during cloudy winter. Also I think you should consider doing a MVP (minimal viable product) with less efficiency but fully functional (as I unde…

An MVP is a totally different think when you're talking about electromechanical equipment that needs to attach to the grid. You need to work so hard just to get something out of the door, you might as well make it good.

Luckily, the market is decently easy to figure out by discussions and logic.

Re: Tesla's 'Dangerously Ambitious' Gigafactory Could Save U.S. Battery Business

#34
post #4

Interesting fact presented in the beginning of the article: all the government funded research/companies went belly up. Food for thought: Is it because of the sheer difficulty of such ventures? Or is it because the money went to the wrong hands?

I'm a founder of an energy storage company, Lightsail Energy. To say all government funded energy storage companies went belly up is an exaggeration. Many still survive, although you will note a strange anti-correlation between government funding and survival. In my opinion a lot of money did go in the wrong hands. The main problem is that the government is totally confused as to its actual funding strategy -- you ne…

Random question after reading a bunch about your company: Are you working at all on using wind turbines to compress the air directly, instead of converting it to electricity first? Seems like that could improve efficiency? Although it seems like your goal is scaling, so maybe it makes sense to stay focused on single product line.

(also, hello from Oakland!)

Re: Tesla's 'Dangerously Ambitious' Gigafactory Could Save U.S. Battery Business

#35
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a founder of an energy storage company, Lightsail Energy. To say all government funded energy storage companies went belly up is an exaggeration. Many still survive, although you will note a strange anti-correlation between government funding and survival. In my opinion a lot of money did go in the wrong hands. The main problem is that the government is totally confused as to its actual funding strategy -- you ne…

Random question after reading a bunch about your company: Are you working at all on using wind turbines to compress the air directly, instead of converting it to electricity first? Seems like that could improve efficiency? Although it seems like your goal is scaling, so maybe it makes sense to stay focused on single product line. (also, hello from Oakland!)

It could improve efficiency but really adds a lot of challenges, not worth it for a 1st product. Good idea though :-)

We patented using wind towers for air storage.

Post reply on HN