Live data from Hacker News

How Understanding the Process of Enlightenment Could Change Science

psychologytomorrowmagazine.com

31–32 of 32 posts

Re: How Understanding the Process of Enlightenment Could Change Science

#31
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not "cessation of ideas and thoughts", and the fact that the story gets it wrong could mean that science gets it wrong, which suggest science will never figure it out.

The language in the article is not clear. Perhaps this post in lifehacker better explains what happens to the brain during meditation. http://lifehacker.com/what-happens-to-the-brain-when-you-med... So why would I want to shut off my brain?

Have you considered the possibility that beta waves are not the best indicator of brain activity? A couple of pretty graphics with colors demonstrates only an interpretation of a certain signal -- whether or not a low signal means the brain is "shut off" is entirely up to interpretation.

Re: How Understanding the Process of Enlightenment Could Change Science

#32
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not "cessation of ideas and thoughts", and the fact that the story gets it wrong could mean that science gets it wrong, which suggest science will never figure it out.

If the fact that science had gotten something wrong had meant science could never figure that thing, science would have brought nothing to mankind.

No doubt! But sometimes a revolution in interpreting the results of experiments is necessary for advancement. While current brain activity measurements may show low values for the measured activity under certain states, that does not, by any means, suggest that the brain is not operating.
Post reply on HN