I No Longer Need StackOverflow
31–40 of 94 posts
Re: I No Longer Need StackOverflow
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Convenience is good but i have to agree with him on this one. Understanding the technology in a deeper way is a lot more useful in the long run. And once you understand it answering other questions you may have gets a lot easier and arguably that 5 hour investment in the beginning may be a bargain. He spends 5 hours to understand it first you spend 5-10 minutes on each question and you may run into dozens if not hund…
Easy solution: 1. Look up the first 60 questions on StackOverflow. That amounts to 5 hours you would've spent on just the first one. 2. If you still have more questions, spend another 5 hours learning the ins and outs of the darn thing. Problem solved: now you're not sacrificing latency for throughput.
You just described the best deterministic algorithm, but it turns out there are even better randomized algorithms, where you "flip a coin" when deciding to look up StackOverflow or keep learning (of course, that may or may not be practical :p).
Re: I No Longer Need StackOverflow
#33Re: I No Longer Need StackOverflow
#34When SO's down, all the programmers grind to a halt. When HN's down, all of them accelerate to levels normally unseen.
Re: I No Longer Need StackOverflow
#35Some guy in his early 20ies thinks he has it all figured out. News at 11.
Re: I No Longer Need StackOverflow
#36Hmm, that's a superb piece of self-promotion. Most experienced developers make the cross-over from needing SO to contributing answers on SO, but it never occurred to me to write about it. I envy the marketing chops this dev acquired in the process; it can make a huge difference to your salary / career.
Re: I No Longer Need StackOverflow
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Easy solution: 1. Look up the first 60 questions on StackOverflow. That amounts to 5 hours you would've spent on just the first one. 2. If you still have more questions, spend another 5 hours learning the ins and outs of the darn thing. Problem solved: now you're not sacrificing latency for throughput.
This is exactly the rent-or-buy problem! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ski_rental_problem You just described the best deterministic algorithm, but it turns out there are even better randomized algorithms, where you "flip a coin" when deciding to look up StackOverflow or keep learning (of course, that may or may not be practical :p).
Hmm... given that you stated that the best randomized algorithms we have beat our best deterministic ones, isn't there a place for even better deterministic algorithm?
Re: I No Longer Need StackOverflow
#38Is not using something for a single day a sign you never need it? I sometimes don't refer to SO for weeks, simply because I'm dealing with problems I can figure out without it. But sometimes I'm dealing with something I'm totally unfamiliar with, and docs and tutorials are badly written, and then some example on Stackoverflow can be a great help. And more importantly, sometimes I'm stuck on something really obscure.…
Re: I No Longer Need StackOverflow
#39I no longer need the Internet. My hamster chewed through a CAT cable last week; it took me three days to notice, so complete was my Zen immersion in creating a period-accurate replica of the first Galilean telescope, using only Haskell lenses. When it finally dawned on me I had attained a sophistication that transcended the internet, I felt the inessentials fall away from my craft in an instant, and I was left in an…
Re: I No Longer Need StackOverflow
#40"Instead of asking StackOverflow if an API exists or a library has a particular feature, I read the docs instead." That's what you're supposed to do :) Ask the question only after you do the homework, not INSTEAD of it