>Telegram is supported by Pavel and Nikolai Durov.
I would not trust social network owner with my messages.
31–40 of 231 posts
>Telegram is supported by Pavel and Nikolai Durov.
I would not trust social network owner with my messages.
From their FAQ: > Q: How secure is Telegram? > Very secure. We are based on a new protocol, MTProto, built by our own specialists from scratch, with security in mind. At this moment, the biggest security threat to your Telegram messages is your mother reading over your shoulder. We took care of the rest. Oh good, a bunch of randoms have rolled their own crypto. I stopped reading at this point.
MTProto's author is Nikolai Durov: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Durov He is one of most legendary math/programming champions of all time.
Colin Percival is similarly decorated, along with being a cryptographer (he's the FreeBSD security officer): http://www.daemonology.net/papers/
... yet even his crypto app Tarsnap was broken for over a year before he noticed, due to a typo during an innocent-looking refactoring change. http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2011-01-18-tarsnap-critical-...
And the only reason the critical bug was found is because it was open source. This, as far as I can see, isn't.
So we have a perfect storm of problems here: An author who has rolled his own crypto, isn't a cryptographer, and whose product is closed source. Trust Telegram at your peril.
It's worth noting that there's an app which already does what Telegram claims to do. It's called TextSecure, and it was written by Moxie Marlinspoke and several other big-name cryptographers: https://whispersystems.org/
... and it's open source: https://github.com/WhisperSystems/TextSecure/
... and they don't try to roll their own crypto: https://github.com/WhisperSystems/TextSecure/wiki/ProtocolV2
These aren't coincidences. It's basic necessity.
EDIT: Telegram is open source, so I was wrong about that and it'd be unfair of me not to mention it. But the other observations still apply. Until Telegram is verified to be secure, I don't think it's a good idea to trust it, especially when secure alternatives like TextSecure exist.
How can this be free? They're not Wikipedia. I'm not sure how they can pay for multiple servers...
The brothers do have some money, I suppose, from their company. However, I'm not sure if they are using the data gathered from this service, thus resulting in revenue somehow (maybe in their social network).
From their FAQ: > Q: How secure is Telegram? > Very secure. We are based on a new protocol, MTProto, built by our own specialists from scratch, with security in mind. At this moment, the biggest security threat to your Telegram messages is your mother reading over your shoulder. We took care of the rest. Oh good, a bunch of randoms have rolled their own crypto. I stopped reading at this point.
MTProto's author is Nikolai Durov: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Durov He is one of most legendary math/programming champions of all time.
Are they using something standard or do they want to lock-down users to their own proprietary servers ?
Where's the desktop app? I guess I'm old fashioned, because I'm looking for the next msn/icq.
Firefox gives me "The certificate is only valid for the following names: *.stel.com , stel.com" for https://telegram.org/
From their FAQ: > Q: How secure is Telegram? > Very secure. We are based on a new protocol, MTProto, built by our own specialists from scratch, with security in mind. At this moment, the biggest security threat to your Telegram messages is your mother reading over your shoulder. We took care of the rest. Oh good, a bunch of randoms have rolled their own crypto. I stopped reading at this point.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6913705
For further reference:
Looks like they kept the interface exactly the same as What's App to attract users. The smiley selection has the entire list of What's App smileys in exactly the same order. What's App is going to be upset, but it might help users.