Earlier quoted context omitted.
Re-read what I said. I'm not talking about what PG or YC recommends with regards to investing. I'm talking about the general idea that if anyone else said something like this and asked for blanket trust: "you can't trust your intuition....rule number zero is: these rules exist for a reason" Well those other people of course can't be trusted like PG and what they say doesn't matter as much. So if a person with 30 year…
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. These aren't universal, unqualified rules and I don't understand why you're trying to generalize them beyon…
"This is interesting and contradicts a bit of "disrupt" meme:"
If I was trying to rebut his point I would have stated that I thought he was wrong "and here is why" which is not what I did, did I?
With medical and legal advice by the way, it's highly likely that you if you talk to 10 professionals, (as the saying goes) you might very well get 10 different opinions.
"I'd say the prior odds of pg contradicting himself "
I didn't say PG contradicted himself at all. I said what he was saying contradicts the "disrupt" meme (if you want to call it that).
"Rather than point out the apparent contradiction and go all j'accuse on the author"
How does what I said in any way rise to the level of this: