Live data from Hacker News

Yahoo redesigns 7 of its sites

yahoo.tumblr.com

31–40 of 43 posts

Re: Yahoo redesigns 7 of its sites

#31

Eek. I think, and I stress that this is wrought of my own unprofessional feelings, but I think that in the early days of rich consumer UI (pre-2004 lets say), that rounded corners, gradients and shadows did some great things to design, because they created affordances so that people knew, for instance, that a button was a button. It stood out against the other website clutter and cruft. But we've sort of moved on. I'…

I agree. For example, I always thought Yahoo had the best sports site out there. Information, easy to find, without distractions.

It looks like I'm not alone...

https://yahoo.uservoice.com/forums/207810

Re: Yahoo redesigns 7 of its sites

#33

Y'know, it's not the site design that turns me off of Yahoo.com. It's the placement of entertainment and sports as the top items on the page. I don't particularly care what your site presentation is (OK, I lied, I do: it should be simple, out of my face, and distraction-free), but if you show contempt and insult me with your content, I'm gone and never coming back.

Entertainment and sports insult you?

Re: Yahoo redesigns 7 of its sites

#34

Y'know, it's not the site design that turns me off of Yahoo.com. It's the placement of entertainment and sports as the top items on the page. I don't particularly care what your site presentation is (OK, I lied, I do: it should be simple, out of my face, and distraction-free), but if you show contempt and insult me with your content, I'm gone and never coming back.

The order of items changes as you make more (or less) frequent use of each section. This has happened for a while, now on Yahoo.com. I don't think it's too presumptuous to think an infrequent user may want entertainment and sports near the top.

Re: Yahoo redesigns 7 of its sites

#35

Eek. I think, and I stress that this is wrought of my own unprofessional feelings, but I think that in the early days of rich consumer UI (pre-2004 lets say), that rounded corners, gradients and shadows did some great things to design, because they created affordances so that people knew, for instance, that a button was a button. It stood out against the other website clutter and cruft. But we've sort of moved on. I'…

I appreciate the minimalism of flat UI, but I do feel the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction. Microsoft is the worst culprit here - presenting a text block containing some hyperlinks, but the text is all styled identically so you have to hover the mouse over a word to notice the link. WTF? Sure, let's keep things clean and minimal, but there needs to be some kind of basic visual language that indica…

That shit drives me insane. I should not have to hover over or consume 100% of your content to determine what is and what is not a link.

Re: Yahoo redesigns 7 of its sites

#37
post #31

Eek. I think, and I stress that this is wrought of my own unprofessional feelings, but I think that in the early days of rich consumer UI (pre-2004 lets say), that rounded corners, gradients and shadows did some great things to design, because they created affordances so that people knew, for instance, that a button was a button. It stood out against the other website clutter and cruft. But we've sort of moved on. I'…

I agree. For example, I always thought Yahoo had the best sports site out there. Information, easy to find, without distractions. It looks like I'm not alone... https://yahoo.uservoice.com/forums/207810

I agree. For years I've turned to yahoo first for sports because they had a simple UI, easily accessible box scores, and good bloggers (at least for basketball). And everything came without forcing too many ads down my throat.

Re: Yahoo redesigns 7 of its sites

#38
I think it's an interesting choice to go dark. Regardless of what prior debates were had on this thread with respect to the "flat design" choice / minimalism there are two things that stand out.

1) It's original. At least, it seems original relative to its competitors. They are borrowing the well-accepted design language of their Weather app (which was critically acclaimed in relevant circles, I believe - like won some kind of award), and assimilated it across their web properties.

Contrary to what other's have said, I don't find the text hard to read. Instead, due to the novelty and aesthetic of the design, I am drawn to stay. It's a nice refresh.

2) It's cohesive. This design language has been consistently ported across its properties without making it constricting. Yahoo Sports is functionally distinct from Yahoo Movies, but blended together by the same aesthetic.

This began with Yahoo silently porting its top bar across its properties (with the search feature ubiquitous across all constituent sites). This final piece was missing and is just another step closer to bringing Yahoo together.

So no, I don't think the designs are cluttered, or that they hide/confuse information, or that Yahoo is copying the fad. I think they are paving their path, boldly, and it should yield some interesting results.

Re: Yahoo redesigns 7 of its sites

#39

Y'know, it's not the site design that turns me off of Yahoo.com. It's the placement of entertainment and sports as the top items on the page. I don't particularly care what your site presentation is (OK, I lied, I do: it should be simple, out of my face, and distraction-free), but if you show contempt and insult me with your content, I'm gone and never coming back.

Entertainment and sports insult you?

Are they relevant to my interests? No.

Do they have any impact on my life? Other than local events impacting my commute: no.

Do they improve me? With the selections Yahoo chooses? Not at all.

Is this information/content I can't get a a bazillion other viral sites? No.

Differentiate. Lead with your strength.

Even going to Yahoo News rather than Yahoo changes the story only very slightly.

Perhaps this will enlighten you: http://onion.com/14yzeCq

Re: Yahoo redesigns 7 of its sites

#40

Eek. I think, and I stress that this is wrought of my own unprofessional feelings, but I think that in the early days of rich consumer UI (pre-2004 lets say), that rounded corners, gradients and shadows did some great things to design, because they created affordances so that people knew, for instance, that a button was a button. It stood out against the other website clutter and cruft. But we've sort of moved on. I'…

> And I think, in light of all that, Yahoo sort of dropped the ball here. They didn't remove the cruft! Distractions distractions distractions.

Like? You didn't even mention one example.

Post reply on HN