I mean, it's not decentralized. It's simply hostable. Decentralized would be like GNUNet[1]. 1: https://gnunet.org/
We're working on federation support, and I think that would be pretty fair to call decentralized? Decentralized can have various definitions; GNUNet is definitely one definition, but you might consider that the web itself is supposed to be decentralized and is designed to be able to be that way, but is moving away from that as more and more of the web is being replaced by megasites like YouTube, Flickr, Tumblr. So, M…
I just think that it's unfair to call it decentralized if each instance of it is out there on its own.
Perhaps once federation is working it'd be a more fair comparison, because at least then all the servers can communicate and share with each other.
Don't take this as an attack on your software. It looks nice and I'm sure it works well (I haven't had a chance to use it).