Just uncheck the Allow non-intrusive option and this becomes a non-issue. With recent onslaught of attack on Ghostery and Ad-block, I wonder if these two tools are doing exactly what they're supposed to do: help people.
What were the attacks on Ghostery? I seem to have missed them.
Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted
31–40 of 242 posts
Re: Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted
#32I defined an exception for AdWords when I first installed an ad blocker. I just want to block the annoying ads, but I understand that many sites have to advertise to stay online. I can live with text ads, but not auto-start videos with sound, animated banner ads, pop-ups, etc.
Re: Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted
#33I think it was immoral and dishonest to sneak in a whitelist feature into AdBlock, which is in direct opposition to the core product value. Imagine a firewall that whitelists certain networks. And background updates add more networks that bought their way into your machine. Not a product I'd be willing to use.
I want to encourage sites providing me with free content to show me adverts that don't annoy me.
And it was announced well enough that I, a non-user, heard of it, so I think 'sneak in' is frankly disingenuous.
Re: Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted
#34Here is the "non-intrusive" filter https://easylist-downloads.adblockplus.org/exceptionrules.tx... It does seem to have a lot of google.
It does seem to have a lot of google.
Google's a rather large advertiser, and put a good deal of work into ensuring their ads behave better than most.Re: Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted
#35Just uncheck the Allow non-intrusive option and this becomes a non-issue. With recent onslaught of attack on Ghostery and Ad-block, I wonder if these two tools are doing exactly what they're supposed to do: help people.
Re: Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted
#36I think it was immoral and dishonest to sneak in a whitelist feature into AdBlock, which is in direct opposition to the core product value. Imagine a firewall that whitelists certain networks. And background updates add more networks that bought their way into your machine. Not a product I'd be willing to use.
Re: Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted
#37Google also already knows categories that generally don't get high ad engagement and doesn't show them for those. An example would be "chuck norris biography" - the intent is clear that you're looking for information primarily and even though I'm sure Amazon or others buy tons of ads against "chuck norris movies", etc. Google is smart enough to know not show you those irrelevant ads.
Re: Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted
#38Re: Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, what others find offensive, you find funny and what you find offensive, other people don't even notice. It's a pretty subjective thing no?
I'm pretty sure it would require an extreme amount of subjectivity to find random noise blaring out of your speakers or drive-by trojan installs acceptable. But sure.
Re: Google paid AdBlock Plus to get its ads whitelisted
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
What were the attacks on Ghostery? I seem to have missed them.
That they were/are being paid for sending analytics to ad companies. I actually don't mind, but it should be in red blinking 20 point script on the page where you download it. I can't find the news.ycombinator threads, though.