Well, there's the smoking gun for the reason behind CISPA. I'm sure tptacek still won't admit he was wrong though.
U.S. National Security Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
31–40 of 78 posts
Re: U.S. National Security Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're in the MAPP program, you promise (on application, and presumably contractually upon membership as well), to: Do you agree to publish monthly protections derived from MAPP information only after Microsoft’s public security update release? I'm doubting the NSA / military hackers make, or honor, any such agreement.
The NSA is not known to publish things.
Re: U.S. National Security Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is very different from your original (hysterical, sensational) claim that MSFT is giving the government "zero days" to "hack people with".
not really what does msft think they're doing with them?
Ask yourself, if you receive information via MAPP, you have some information which could be turned into an exploit, but it will not be useful towards a goal of hacking other peoples computers for long because, by definition, it is going to be patched soon. "Make hay while the sun shines" perhaps? The same window of opportunity is open to governments and corporations around the world (many Chinese companies are MAPP subscribes, the one leak of a MAPP exploit happened perhaps because of a Chinese company).
Re: U.S. National Security Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
#34Re: U.S. National Security Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
#35Before they agreed to install the system on their networks, some of the five major Internet companies -- AT&T Inc. (T), Verizon Communications Inc (VZ)., Sprint Nextel Corp. (S), Level 3 Communications Inc (LVLT). and CenturyLink Inc (CTL). -- asked for guarantees that they wouldn’t be held liable under U.S. wiretap laws. Those companies that asked received a letter signed by the U.S. attorney general indicating such exposure didn’t meet the legal definition of a wiretap and granting them immunity from civil lawsuits, the person said."
This will make the ACLU's law suit 1000% more interesting as a legal battle.
Verizon doesn't just sit around and think to themselves "hey, if we're going to work with the NSA we should do some CYA". They have entire legions of smart lawyers who mulled this whole NSA business over (substantially I hope) and came to the conclusion that "this is most certainly a violation of the law and we need complete documented assurance from the government that our actions can never be prosecuted in court".
And they got it. But will it hold up?
Re: U.S. National Security Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
#36Re: U.S. National Security Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
#37Re: U.S. National Security Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
#38"AT&T, Verizon Before they agreed to install the system on their networks, some of the five major Internet companies -- AT&T Inc. (T), Verizon Communications Inc (VZ)., Sprint Nextel Corp. (S), Level 3 Communications Inc (LVLT). and CenturyLink Inc (CTL). -- asked for guarantees that they wouldn’t be held liable under U.S. wiretap laws. Those companies that asked received a letter signed by the U.S. attorney general…
Re: U.S. National Security Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
#39Re: U.S. National Security Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
#40Well, there's the smoking gun for the reason behind CISPA. I'm sure tptacek still won't admit he was wrong though.
What was tptacek wrong about?
tptacek: "Someone on Twitter (sorry) said that Google and Facebook "looked like angels" compared to Verizon. That sounds about right to me, too."