Earlier quoted context omitted.
The DRM on DVDs, while obviously long ago cracked wide open, still carries the legal implications of DRM. > Music industry already dumped DRM for good. This is the part that really gets to me. The music industry is still largely dominated by the sort of companies that also dominate video, and music files are vastly easier to trade around due to their siz, and yet DRM in music is nearly completely nonexistent these da…
Video costs many times more to produce, and is generally consumed only once. Music is cheap to make and people tend to listen many times over, making the try-it-and-purchase-it model a genuine possibility that video doesn't really have.
For example games are hard to produce (and it usually takes a long time). Still you can get very good games DRM free, because in gaming the faults of DRM are especially apparent.
The downside of DRM - it insults paying customers, it lowers the usability of the content (restricting it to selected devices / players etc.), it also doesn't affect pirates, since the moment that DRM is broken by some skillful crackers - DRM free copies are widely distributed.
So let's see - no one benefits from DRM. Who is in downside? Paying users. So what is the point in using it anywhere?