Live data from Hacker News

So what happened to the HN server?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 133 posts

Re: So what happened to the HN server?

#31
post #20
post #13

phew Almost thought HN was blocked here in China...

There is no way to know if it's just you for whom it's blocked? Are services like isup.me/domain also blocked?

www.viewdns.info has a "Chinese Firewall Test" to check if a particular domain is blocked in China.

Re: So what happened to the HN server?

#34

More importantly, why isn't there a status page for something that's equivalent to a lifesaving drug for many?

there's only one server. if the server is down, then assume the status is not 'green'.

How can Joe-random-user be certain the server is down?

Re: So what happened to the HN server?

#35
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you paying for this?

What would you say if Google.com was down for 2 hours due to a server upgrade? Do you pay Google for searching? Bonus points if you do actually. Their search API is limited to 100 a day, which is not a lot.

If you're using google search, you're paying google in ad impressions.

Re: So what happened to the HN server?

#36

More importantly, why isn't there a status page for something that's equivalent to a lifesaving drug for many?

use twitter - there were various things there, including an explanation from pg and some people recommending alternatives. https://twitter.com/search?q=hacker%20news&src=typd

And five free issues from Hacker Monthly :) . That made me happy.

Re: So what happened to the HN server?

#38
post #21

Saturday, I thought: "This guy (PG) is really brave, everybody is nowadays using virtualized server environments on mulit-core machines and PG just gets some bare metal and puts his app on one core and one thread. WTF, this guy is a genius, single-threaded apps on bare metal FTW, this is so great and I am doing this too." After seeing this thing down for several hours -- and Google hate downtimes, they punish you ins…

the site actually runs very quickly, so can't argue it needs more cores / threads. seems the issue was more with the migration. so i reckon you're good to get back to removing all the threads from your apps :)

I wanted to reply that it's actually relatively fast, not very fast. Much faster than before, but there are many sites which are much quicker.

Timing some pages, the response is around 350ms. That means 95% of the loading time is networking, not generation time. You're right, the server is really fast given the load HN brings down on one server!

Post reply on HN