"I Want Hue" – Colors for Data Scientists
31–40 of 40 posts
Re: "I Want Hue" – Colors for Data Scientists
#32As someone who has put together figures for a scientific paper, I can safely say that the last thing I want are a wide-range of colors to use. Many people are color-blind, and many people print on black & white printers. So when I design the figures, I stick with pure colors. Pure red (255,0,0) or pure green (0,255,0) or pure blue (0,0,255). I suppose it would be smarter to design a set of color codes where even if s…
Go here for good color scales and spare yourself the risk of getting it all wrong: http://colorbrewer2.org
If you're going to not use colorbrewer, please, either know what you're doing (and if you're reading this comment, you don't) you either stick with black and white, or you at least use orange and blue (orange and blue is a combination that's safe with most common types of color-blindness, and also tends to separate well in black-and-white conversions).
Just as importantly: don't try to guess what colors look like for colorblind people, either (and don't do it in RGB space like the original post suggested either! RGB is a device-centric coordinate system; please use something like Lab or Luv). The rightest, simplest way to simulate different types of color blindness is to use define 2D affine subspaces of Lab space, like here: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/%7Eoliveira/pubs_files/CVD_Mass_Spri... (figure 2, in page 3)
Re: "I Want Hue" – Colors for Data Scientists
#33I really like the interaction and flexibility, but I failed to generate a set of colors as nice as those provided by Color Brewer ( http://colorbrewer2.org/ ). Sure, Color Brewer doesn't dynamically generate color schemes, but the set of colors it provides looks damn good in just about any context. I might use this new app in cases where I need more than 12 colors (Color Brewer's limit), but I don't think dynamic col…
Re: "I Want Hue" – Colors for Data Scientists
#34As someone who has put together figures for a scientific paper, I can safely say that the last thing I want are a wide-range of colors to use. Many people are color-blind, and many people print on black & white printers. So when I design the figures, I stick with pure colors. Pure red (255,0,0) or pure green (0,255,0) or pure blue (0,0,255). I suppose it would be smarter to design a set of color codes where even if s…
This will sound snarky, but there's just too much that's wrong with this comment to let it stand. For people reading this: please don't do any the above. Go here for good color scales and spare yourself the risk of getting it all wrong: http://colorbrewer2.org If you're going to not use colorbrewer, please, either know what you're doing (and if you're reading this comment, you don't) you either stick with black and w…
Re: "I Want Hue" – Colors for Data Scientists
#35This is really nice! And attractive. One of the reasons I'll probably stick with ColorBrewer palettes for now is that I can easily find color schemes that are safe for people with colorblindness or for display in particular environments.
Re: "I Want Hue" – Colors for Data Scientists
#36Re: "I Want Hue" – Colors for Data Scientists
#37It's interesting they've started this médialab in Science Po, which is (as the name implies) a social sciences university [0] in Paris [1]. Looking at the team [2] the name of Bruno Latour as a director seems a bit out of place. After his controversial views on the social construction of science [3] I find it astonishing that he is put at the head of the department that is in charge of bridging the world of the socia…
Re: "I Want Hue" – Colors for Data Scientists
#38It's interesting they've started this médialab in Science Po, which is (as the name implies) a social sciences university [0] in Paris [1]. Looking at the team [2] the name of Bruno Latour as a director seems a bit out of place. After his controversial views on the social construction of science [3] I find it astonishing that he is put at the head of the department that is in charge of bridging the world of the socia…
I don't see Latour as a particularly bad choice for bridging those worlds. One of his main points is paying close empirical attention to both how scientists actually work, and how non-human things work. Unlike a lot of humanities theorists of science, he actually went into laboratories and wrote down what seem like pretty honest accounts of what he found there. He's fairly controversial among pure social construction…
It's a little hard to find in print, even in libraries. But I'm sure one could source a digital copy from a less reputable source.
Re: "I Want Hue" – Colors for Data Scientists
#39It's interesting they've started this médialab in Science Po, which is (as the name implies) a social sciences university [0] in Paris [1]. Looking at the team [2] the name of Bruno Latour as a director seems a bit out of place. After his controversial views on the social construction of science [3] I find it astonishing that he is put at the head of the department that is in charge of bridging the world of the socia…
I don't see Latour as a particularly bad choice for bridging those worlds. One of his main points is paying close empirical attention to both how scientists actually work, and how non-human things work. Unlike a lot of humanities theorists of science, he actually went into laboratories and wrote down what seem like pretty honest accounts of what he found there. He's fairly controversial among pure social construction…
Re: "I Want Hue" – Colors for Data Scientists
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see Latour as a particularly bad choice for bridging those worlds. One of his main points is paying close empirical attention to both how scientists actually work, and how non-human things work. Unlike a lot of humanities theorists of science, he actually went into laboratories and wrote down what seem like pretty honest accounts of what he found there. He's fairly controversial among pure social construction…
This probably isn't the place to have a debate on Latour, but let me just say that it is possible to read him unsympathetically (as Sokal does) or sympathetically, to try to understand the viewpoint he is trying to get across. I've found it worthwhile to do the latter, but YMMV.
Actually, while I thought the Sokal hoax itself was brilliant, I'm in retrospect quite disappointed by his follow-up book. It reads like a bit of a lazy hatchet-job by someone trying to put together an "attack" piece without having read the stuff he's attacking, and certainly not trying to read it sympathetically.