Live data from Hacker News

Rumor: Apple Building Bluetooth Smart Watch

techcrunch.com

31–40 of 49 posts

Re: Rumor: Apple Building Bluetooth Smart Watch

#31

Really now. I understand there might be some small market for "smart watches," but who, honestly, still wears a watch? And who would want to wear a watch that you will (possibly) have to charge daily? This is a watch in name only. That aside, I can see benefits to connected devices such as this. I'm just not sure I'd call them watches.

I stopped wearing watches many years ago, shortly after i got my first mobile. Some years later i thought "ah what the hell, get a real watch" and i hate wearing no watch nowadays. I feel like it's a nice looking jewelry, it has a function, it has style and (probably most importantly) in the world full of electronics it is a masterpiece of precision mechanics.

In short, nothing will ever beat the fine art of mechanic movements, i really prefer wearing that to a plain electronic watch: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Russian-...

P.S.: Of course i would never ever wear the smart watch this post is about. I kind of feel ashamed that i did wear casio "calculator" watches as a kid.. horrible :P

Re: Rumor: Apple Building Bluetooth Smart Watch

#33
post #23

I don't see why this suddenly appears to be 'revolutionary' when Sony has had this for a long time?[1] Heck you can even buy an Android powered Sony watch WITH THE SAME DESIGN even now! [1] http://www.sonymobile.com/gb/products/accessories/smartwatch...

Sony Mobile (formerly Sony Ericsson) have been making various Bluetooth watches since 2006

Re: Rumor: Apple Building Bluetooth Smart Watch

#34
I have gone the complete opposite direction of the many questioning who wears a watch anymore. Recently I picked up my first automatic, a Seiko of course. I have worn it for about 2 months now, and am about to tear into it. There are a lot of sites that sell after market hands, faces and of course straps. The movement I picked up is well documented and will allow me to get into it without too much problem. There is something magical about a device that requires no power other than being worn. It tells decent time, but loses a few seconds a month. Thats part of the charm of it. Can your GPS Mobile device tell better time? Of course it can. But that isn't really the point. After only two months, I feel quite an attachment to it and actually feel naked without it. I do use it functionally though. A quick flick of the wrist will always be faster than pulling a phone out of the pocket, pushing a button and putting it back in your pocket. There is of course the aesthetic/fashion aspect as well. Currently I have a nice nato strap which has received a ton of compliments. After many years of no watch and relying on PDA's and Smart Phones, I can safely say I am now a watch wearer for life.

Re: Rumor: Apple Building Bluetooth Smart Watch

#35
post #23

I don't see why this suddenly appears to be 'revolutionary' when Sony has had this for a long time?[1] Heck you can even buy an Android powered Sony watch WITH THE SAME DESIGN even now! [1] http://www.sonymobile.com/gb/products/accessories/smartwatch...

I agree that "revolutionary" is a little strong given that its just a rumor. However, the first iPhone is frequently described as revolutionary despite being far from the first smartphone/touchscreen smartphone. Given the sad state of the current smart watch market, apple's smart watch could be considered revolutionary. (when it exists and provided its a huge improvement).

Re: Rumor: Apple Building Bluetooth Smart Watch

#36
post #23

I don't see why this suddenly appears to be 'revolutionary' when Sony has had this for a long time?[1] Heck you can even buy an Android powered Sony watch WITH THE SAME DESIGN even now! [1] http://www.sonymobile.com/gb/products/accessories/smartwatch...

From the piece: "It won’t be revolutionary, per se — many have already entered the smart watch space"

Anyway, I would buy this. I stopped wearing a watch when I got my first cell phone back in the late 90's but recently (last year) started wearing an iPod nano as a watch. I use it for listening to the radio/music during my commute and it's great.

It's also a conversation piece as most people haven't seen anything like it and the idea of a multi-touch interface on a watch blows their minds. The only drawback is a lack of bluetooth connectivity, I yearn for the ability to get data/updates from my phone while it's pocketed or stream music to an external device from my 16gb watch. Also there is no audio output except for the headphone jack which makes timers/alarms pointless unless you always have headphones on.

It's really to bad that nobody has hacked the 6th gen nano as it would be great for home-brew. Something else I want is a "stealth" bootable usb device on my wrist. :o)

Re: Rumor: Apple Building Bluetooth Smart Watch

#37
post #23

I don't see why this suddenly appears to be 'revolutionary' when Sony has had this for a long time?[1] Heck you can even buy an Android powered Sony watch WITH THE SAME DESIGN even now! [1] http://www.sonymobile.com/gb/products/accessories/smartwatch...

Who claimed it was revolutionary? In fact, from the article: "It won’t be revolutionary, per se — many have already entered the smart watch space — but Apple has a knack for making niche devices mainstream.", which is an assessment I agree with. The iPhone and iPad also weren't "revolutionary" by your standards; there were plenty of smart phones and tablets on the market before then. But Apple certainly popularized the smart phone and the tablet pc. They could potentially do that again with smart watches.

Re: Rumor: Apple Building Bluetooth Smart Watch

#38

Really now. I understand there might be some small market for "smart watches," but who, honestly, still wears a watch? And who would want to wear a watch that you will (possibly) have to charge daily? This is a watch in name only. That aside, I can see benefits to connected devices such as this. I'm just not sure I'd call them watches.

I went on vacation recently where I'd be spending much of my time at the pool and beach. I'm pretty anal about knowing what the time is, so I got myself an $11 Casio watch at Walmart.

I haven't taken it off since. I use it for everything from taking a shower to giving my son a few minutes to finish playing with whatever he is playing with[1]. On the other hand, pulling your phone from your pocket, reaching for it from the desk/counter, and especially "where the hell is my phone" is far too taxing when all you want to do is tell time.

[1] Before the watch, I'd give him the "Alright, it's time for bed — how about you play for 5 more minutes," and just lose track of time which lead to inconsistency, which usually leads to frustration in children. Giving him 5 minutes and then saying "ok time's up" in 1 minute has to be frustrating. Conversely, giving him 5 minutes and letting him keep playing for 15 minutes results in future "I know you're bluffing," attitude.

Granted, sometimes a simple "once you're done playing with x, then it's time for bed," suffices. No need to go all-out Pavlov.

Re: Rumor: Apple Building Bluetooth Smart Watch

#39
If Apple is smart, they will build only the watch face and allow people to install it in any number of 3rd party wristbands ala the iPod Nano. In fact, I would wager that their entrance into this market is a direct response to the popularity of using the 6th Generation iPod Nano as a watch.
Post reply on HN